It may be useful in times like these to contemplate the impermanence and randomless of the world we live in.
The original job I had was "welder", for which the lower end of the pay range was about $20-$30k, and after some additional decades of experience you could dream of rising to $40-$50k.
I have had some pretty dumb programming jobs, but on the whole it seems pretty fortunate for there to be a job where you can be a college dropout and outearn dentists (or, for that matter, fleet admirals in the US Navy).
Looking at the other comments, I decided to look up what this place was, and could not find any results anywhere online for a software company called "Coremix". Combined with the strangeness on the form being linked to here, I am a little sus.
I think this depends on a radical redefinition of what it means to "share" something. If I put a book in a self-storage unit, and later go to retrieve it, is the owner of the property "providing" or "sharing" the book? What if I am leasing an apartment from a landlord?
I suppose it is an issue inherent to services set up to run through central providers, who can institute arbitrary controls on the services, i.e. if they don't they are failing to do so, which of course exposes them to liability and censure, et cetera.
Irrespective of this is right or wrong, the concern of the lawyers at google would not be "If Google _should_ be held accountable for the private activity of users", the concern of the lawyers will always be "what _could_ they be held accountable for."
I think that websites as old as bash.org ought to just release database dumps so that other people have a fair shot at getting them back when they croak, sua sponte, without the sustained active cooperation of the most-recent maintainers. There are a number of websites that have lasted for decades because of this (and having the contents released CC0 doesn't hurt either, of course).