68% of South Africans have bought or own BTC? There is simply no way. Impossible.

I agree, I find this claim very doubtful and would be interested in the source of this claim.

I really really wish that LLMs had an "eject" function - as in I could click on any message in a chat, and it would basically start a new clone chat with the current chat's thread history.

There are so many times where I get to a point where the conversation is finally flowing in the way that I want and I would love to "fork" into several directions from that one specific part of the conversation.

Instead I have to rely on a prompt that requests the LLM to compress the entire conversation into a non-prose format that attempts to be as semantically lossless as possible; this sadly never works as in ten did [sic].

This is precisely what the poorly named Edit button does in Claude.

Google UI supports branching and delete someone recently made a blog post about how great it is

which Google UI?

ai.dev AI studio sorry

LM studio has a fork button on every chat part. Sorry, can't think of a better word - you can fork on any human or ai part. You can also edit, but editing isn't, it essentially creates a copy of the context with the edit, and sends the whole thing to the AI. This can overflow your context window, so it isn't recommended. Forking of course does the same thing, but it is obvious that it is doing so, whereas people are surprised to learn editing sends everything.

You can use LibreChat which allows you to fork messages: https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/fork

such a useful response, thanks

In December, yes. Otherwise the Ruski are most delicious

where is this guideline text from? Want to explore, tx.

? You have been here for a while, of course I meant

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I got confused on some words in my memory during the rush, sorry.

Did you understand any different reference?

Nice, now can any cuneiform nerds that have an interest in Ramses III guide me to any quote that roughly translates to "violence is necessary against Isfet". For the life of me, I cannot seem to find any reference to it although I've got it in my notes from... somewhere?

Grok 3 says "For instance, in the Poem of Pentaur, a propagandistic account of the Battle of Kadesh, Ramses II is depicted as a heroic figure restoring order against the chaotic Hittite forces. While it doesn’t say “violence is necessary against Isfet” verbatim, the subtext is that decisive action, including violence, was justified to crush disorder and uphold Ma'at."

(It had earlier defined Ma'at as "order, balance, and justice")

I think this is the reference but I'm too lazy to get a TLDR https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24917679

just saw this after my post https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=41980334 - sorry @dang

But not the first submission? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41977199

OP said effectively zero, not zero. These are semantically very different.

Yeah this is actually important distinction.

It exists but not to an extent the impact to the overall social structure is actually functionally impactful

They serve as “impossible standards” and generally excluded as outliers - occasionally as leaders but in many cases they are assassinated for challenging authorities or otherwise demonized.