It is about power and inequality, and the system-wide outcomes overall of such moves. We are seeing massive consolidation of wealth at the top. Relaxed attitudes like yours won't slow this down.
Most of the policies I've seen proposed lately have a very Marxist or communist feel to them. Personally I'm not willing to go down that road as a solution, though I'd love solutions that don't go to such extremes.
Communism would be dispossessing all the farmers and store of everything they have, assigning workers to these industries and deciding what they should plant, package, and provide and how the wares ought to be distributed to society.
It doesn't help discussion to mislabel every form of government intervention as communism.
It frames things every functional government does as somehow a slippery slide towards the USSR.
I have worked closely over the years with people from Ivy League/Oxbridge schools to small universities from developing countries and I would not put the people from the elite institutions at the top of the rankings of discipline or ability from my experience.
"Narya was backed with about $100mn from Thiel and a cadre of his acquaintances, including former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt and prominent venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Scott Dorsey."
I could believe that a lot of people under 20 would not know who Zuckerberg is at all, but definitely know who Messi is, if we are talking outside of the USA. Cristiano Ronaldo would be another.
To add to what to the other poster said, and to help explain, also were you influenced in buying blueberries because of what other people did in your graph?
I don't think we have sufficient models as to why each transaction happens or not. For example, why did someone buy blueberries instead of raspberries?
What is expensive to you? 200EUR works out to a few euros a week. That is fantastic value compared to anything I have experienced in other EU countries in this decade.