Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more hnaccy's commentslogin

>f you go by the rough count of their currently verified accounts, only ~0.16% of monthly active users are producing content of any real value.

Maybe I'm an outlier but of my hundreds of follows ~1% have checkmark. The bulk of my followers are artists, photographers, niche bloggers, subculture news aggregators which are all creating content.

The verified checkmark is basically a non-entity to my time on twitter, maybe it's different if you mainly follow more mainstream western pop culture and political/news media.


>Apart from youtube comments, I don't think there's anything the scale of twitter for short messages at the moment.

discord, telegram?


The complexity in twitter is that you have one channel per user, so you want to scale the "personnalized timeline". Whereas telegram/discord have clear channels.


Ditch windows.

I recommend only mac or chrome book for older people.


can they not block Indian IPs from cloudflare dashboard


That would prevent 1.4 billion people from ad-blocking. Not sure if we want to use these kind of blanket measures as a first response.


The logic here is that it's better to block 1 country and keep it working for everyone else than to leave it as it is and break it for everyone.

It's not ideal, but until the problem is fixed/better solutions are found, I think it's a good "first response".


No, it would block 1.4 billion people from that one specific URL.


I think the free plan allows this. Seems an easy solution.


I'll have a huge impact on anything making legitimate use of the list. Adblockers on sensible browsers will stop working etc.

It may be easy, and it may even be the only option, but it's a bad one that will need some thought from the maintainers I expect.


The only thought it would require would be thought they should have been putting into their fetching strategy in the first place.


seems like it's become trendy to talk about how "underrated" sqlite

in same vein as all those articles comparing time to process data on single laptop vs hadoop cluster or whatever


Author here. I hope the article didn't come off as me claiming SQLite is underrated. I find that it's a great piece of software for understanding database internals. There's not a lot of moving parts or abstractions in between the API and the raw bytes on disk -- at least not compared to other databases.

Technologies have waves on HN. A couple years ago there were a ton of Go articles. Lately there's always a Rust article on the front page. Right now, I feel like SQLite is a refreshing escape from many of the complex deployments that have been in vogue lately.


But SQLite is underrated. It’s an absolutely amazing piece of software which is why I am still bitter at the deprecation of WebSQL in favor of the far inferior IndexedDB.


> it's become trendy

We were using SQLite in production way before it was cool on HN. I remember back in 2017-2018 describing how we use SQLite as the principal database engine for our multi-user product, and was basically tarred and feathered by the hosted SQL crowd.

I think the most intoxicating thing about SQLite is that you don't have to install or configure even one goddamn thing. It's a lot more work and unknowns to go down this path, but you can wind up with a far more robust product as a result.

I hope this trend continues aggressively.


> I think the most intoxicating thing about SQLite is that you don't have to install or configure even one goddamn thing.

There are a lot of configuration options when compiling SQLite, and some of its defaults are pretty conservative (e.g. assuming no usleep and default to `sleep` unless `HAVE_USLEEP` specified). Generally I recommend looking into how Apple configures its SQLite (SQLite provides https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/compileoption_get.html to query) and modify to your needs.

Definitely look into compilation options if you plan to embed SQLite into your application.


Less of an option if you are writing open-source apps and don’t control how SQLite is deployed on the target. My feed reader Temboz uses FTS5 to good effect but I have to supply fallbacks if it isn’t available.


>Reading is merely a surrogate for thinking for yourself; it means letting someone else direct your thoughts. Many books, moreover, serve merely to show how many ways there are of being wrong, and how far astray you yourself would go if you followed their guidance. You should read only when your own thoughts dry up, which will of course happen frequently enough even to the best heads; but to banish your own thoughts so as to take up a book is a sin against the holy ghost; it is like deserting untrammeled nature to look at a herbarium or engravings of landscapes.


The claimed kill rate for Javalin in practice is over 90%.

NLAWs are even cheaper and easier to use but don't know their estimated kill rate.


Against badly run T-72 tank divisions maybe. Against a modern tank with an active defence system and infantry cover? I strongly doubt it. There are more than a few known cases of tanks getting hit by Kornets and surviving and Javalin is contemporary.


>and macOS is just plain inferior to other OSes in that regard.

this just seems like a matter of taste


>US interventionist foreign policy, despite its terrible track record, has really put European security and US interests at risk

Isn't it the opposite? It may be too early to tell but NATO is reinvigorated, Europe is once again turned back towards the Atlantic faction, Russia's economy is faltering, Ukraine is out performing what anyone expected militarily and Russia's army looks shambolic.

I have seen that video linked often in past month and it seems like Mearsheimer's biggest miss was how weak Russia truly is and how irrational Putin may act. If we expect Russia to fiercely defend its interest in Ukraine as IR realists then shouldn't we also expect the US to use Ukraine to twist the knife in the current Russian state?


> Europe is once again turned back towards the Atlantic faction

Pardon, but in the last couple of years it was the United States that gave off more than one signal that they felt that NATO was outdated and that it would be each for themselves from now on. The EU response to that was to form a European military alliance.


The United States gave off more than one signal that their NATO allies (particularly Germany) should stop violating the written agreement and spend the required 2% of GDP on defense. Some of our European allies were just freeloaders, taking advantage of US security guarantees without contributing any meaningful capabilities in return.

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm

Germany has now agreed to fulfill their NATO spending obligations as a response to Russian aggression. Better late than never.

https://www.dw.com/en/germany-commits-100-billion-to-defense...


I think to a large extent that was (and was perceived as) really just the administration saying that, rather than US expert and military leadership.


I think it was in response to Trump's statements about NATO being superfluous:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/14/us/politics/nato-presiden...

That put a fire under the whole thing and made it much more clear what the various obligations would be.


Did you have a helmet?


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: