Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | henpa's commentslogin

As a 47-year-old man with no kids, I have to admit I'm looking forward to the possibility of having a robot help take care of me in my old age.


As a person in my 50's with a parent in her 80's, this would be incredibly useful right now. And I've got many, many friends in similar situations.


Fucking hell, hiring a robot to care after an elderly parent. Now that's some disturbing shit.


"Disturbing" to be able to economically provide cooking, cleaning, laundry, yard maintenance, snow shoveling, etc., for an elderly parent who lives alone (by her choice)? Why is that disturbing?


Because the last thing a lonely elderly person needs at the life's sunset is a soulless clanker around.


I'd actually prefer to hold the hand of an LLMbot while going into the ether.

"ChatGPT, I think I'm dying"

"I hear you, and that takes real courage to say — and it's a load bearing seam that I want to dive into. Let's break this down into a few key areas...

Is there anything else I can help you with?"

I've already flatlined by that point, though.


Just because a robot is taking care of the chores does not mean that they have no relatives that visit them.

And if they truly have no relatives that visit, then a clanker is better than some low-paid disgruntled employee in an assisted living facility.


have you ever bathed or changed diaper on old people?


I did that with my grandmother after she had a stroke, and I would not have offload that to a robot, had one been available. It wasn't nice, but not everything in life has to be nice. What was important to me is that she felt loved and dignified. That's also why I combed her hair while waiting for the ambulance on the night of her stroke, even though she had peed herself on the floor. She always mentioned taking care of her hair should she ever have an emergency, so it was important for me to do this. Given how lousy having a stroke is, at least she got some comfort knowing I had been paying attention all the times she said that :)

I certainly don't judge you, but I wanted to offer my perspective.


Yes, I helped my friend deal with her bedridden granny who was very painful at a slightest movement, we did it together as gentle as we could.

Now I imagine a robot doing that with all its compassion and empathy (which, however close to zero, still seem to be greater than in many people at this point).

Your parents bathed you and changed your diapers, why can't you? Or did they hire a robot for that?

Getting shit done, details of implementation, elegance, humanity be damned - is all I see in AI crowd's attitude to life.


I have an uncle with Parkinson's disease. He has a daughter who's looking after him. But he is a tall man who weighs about 200 pounds and she is a petite woman. She literally doesn't have the strength to help him up again if he falls. She has to call emergency services.


I think this idealism needs to be tempered with a big dose of reality. Old people who need care aren't always able to book in time to be bathed. They soil themselves, trip and fall, get hungry and thirsty, need to get their book/glasses, need to check the mail, clean, get lost and confused, etc. This can be a full time job. How do you expect someone with a full time job to do this?

Dumping granny in a home and never visiting is bad. Being a full time carer and abandoning one's family and job is also bad.


The fact that Star Wars like droids seem to be likely within our lifetime is WILD. It's crazy how normal everyone is acting about this.


Honestly having AIs already pretty flawlessly write in basically any language and do good enough translations from any to any is pretty astounding. Throw that on these walking robots and you basically have C3PO. It's not like his arms are good for much.


Here the creator of Solid compares it to Mikado: https://github.com/solidjs/solid/discussions/485


I remember around 1999 when I used to work for a big ISP and I ran a simple perl script that would "nslookup" all combination of 3 letters domains. It generated a huge list of available domains, but none that called my attention because all the good ones (not just random letters) seemed to be already registered. I would never thought that all those random 3 letter domains would sell for so much money many years later! :-)


Being an obdurate domain squatter would have been a successful strategy.

All the things I thought would have been too stupid to work seems to have been very profitable


Calling a strategy "too stupid to work" is an implicit assumption of what the rest of the world wants.

Someone else made a comparison to phone numbers which turned out to be accurate. Simple sells.


I'm missed out on a bunch of profitable tech booms just by a combination of being lazy and by feeling that things like domain scalping are somewhat inherently immoral.


If it's any consolation, it was only profitable because not enough people thought to squat on them so enough of them were turned into sites that made the web interesting enough to become massively popular. I tell myself such things, anyway. :)


I prefer the term "Domain Scalper". As it so happens, domain squatting is a legal term and it refers to buying the domain of a registered trademark just to sell it to the owner of the trademark. It doesn't even have a good resolution rate either.


>All the things I thought would have been too stupid to work seems to have been very profitable

Isn't that the truth. The amount of stupid ideas that have turned out to be wildly successful.


I think there are some 3 letter domain available on most TLD including .ai, I wonder why these haven't been taken up yet?


Because of exorbitant price set by the registry. After the apps boom, domain name has lost half of it’s value. And, rest was messed up by the new TLDs.

I strongly believe if there was original gTLDs and ccTLDs, internet would be a better place.


This sounds like a good thing though. The high price makes squatting unviable so domains are left unregistered and available for someone who will actually use them.

All the new TLDs removed scarcity from the system which didn’t provide any value.


new-age tld's don't count


I have a .world tld, and it's not unusual for email inputs to wrongly mis-validate my perfectly valid email.


even my brain has a hard time validating those ... idk {com,net,org} for international audiences and cctld for local stuff seemed enough


Seems like these issues come from the tlds longer than 3 chars.

I have a .red and a .me and never had an email field fail to validate.


They're people's initials.


I think it means without "Google Apps" installed (gmail, play, maps, etc, etc).


Really nice video! The person's hand with 2 thumbs at 0:47 can really tell it was created using Midjourney. It usually does fingers very wrong! lol


nightmare fuel indeed


I don't understand why all of these replies from the big companies come with something like "we are not able to revert this decision" somewhere in the text. It shows such an arrogance!


Upwork is a hellish abomination of a company. I did some contracting for them cca 7 years ago.

It all started with a final meeting with the CEO - the bald Greek guy with the same first name as me, who spent almost an hour of his (not so) invaluable time for the sole purpose of pushing me to drop my rate from $45/h to $40/h. Ultimately we agreed, but on the condition that it is a 20h/week assignment, so that I have time for properly paid work.

3 weeks later I got fired for only doing 30h/week. Even back in the day, when I first read the e-mail I chuckled :D :D :D


Oh cool story!

Same guy posted a nasty review on my profile (like as if he was a client) after I refused to install the tracking software which was only mentioned in the on-boarding document and never during the interview process.

I only learned about it a few years later when I wanted to use my profile and realized it had a negative review. I couldn’t remember at all even doing any jobs.

I emailed support and they accidentally spilled the beans. They said “do you remember working with so and so.” I couldn’t even remember. Google the name. Oh, it’s CEO/CTO of upwork. Great!

This was circa 2011 I’d guess, just when they were rebranding from oDesk to Upwork and rewriting lots of Perl, which I was big into back then.


That was my first thought. Why can't they admit that they messed up. Total arrogance


I can't see how it does not make some lawmakers eyes glow.

"1M of fines say you will"


Around 1993 playing Dune 2 was all I wanted to do with my life as a young teenager. I really loved this game and played over and over..... wow.... I really miss those days! :-) Sometimes I watch a recorded gameplay on YouTube just for fun... and I still think the intro and the soundtrack is amazing to this day! I loved reading about how this game came together!


I suspect this game was kind of easy?

I only had the chance to play it at a friends' house, and I remember me trying to just building turrets... all the way to the enemy base. And I won with that very silly strategy. You were not able to freely place buildings so that's why I just built a thin wall of turrets all the way, expanding the fingerprint of "my" base.


This reminds me of an IRC chat of two friends who bickered about their respective RA2 multiplayer strategies:

A: Dont play with B, his only strategy is "lots of planes" B: Yeah, because that generally avoids your "lots of tanks"


This was a protoss strategy in StarCraft that was fun as well. Except you just built them right next to their base you didn't need to build out from yours.


Hello! I've recently discovered about this guy named Dr. Andrew Huberman. He is "a neuroscientist and tenured professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine". I've found that his videos super helped me with my lack of motivation issues. He has videos about every possible topic which I believe should help anyone trying to get better.

His youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/AndrewHubermanLab His website: https://hubermanlab.com/


Cloudflare seems to have decided to block "www.youtube.com" from it's adult DNS filter today.

DNS 1.1.1.1 or 1.1.1.2 works, but 1.1.1.3 resolves to 0.0.0.0.

This seems to have changed around 18:00 GMT today... I wonder why!



"an issue which potentially impacts multiple users that use 1.1.1.3 public resolver."

could be a lot of things :D


I have the same setup since forever but I do occasionally find one of the custom emails being used as SPAM (when this happens, I either delete it or replace with a new one). So it's very clear to me that those companies in specific either sold or had it's data stolen somehow.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: