Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | halestock's commentslogin

> The Moroun family - the American owners of the neighbouring Ambassador Bridge that also connects Detroit to Canada - appealed to Trump during his first term to stop construction of the new bridge, arguing that it infringed on their exclusive ability to collect tolls.

Ah, that’s why he cares.


Even better, he supported it during his first term.

> Trump and then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued a joint statement saying the bridge was a "vital economic link" between the countries.


> A subset of the population doesn't have self control? Ban it everyone. Even if it's a wildly popular form of entertainment

Like gambling?


or cigarettes?

Or drugs?

Cigarettes are drugs

Or coffee?

The drug so popular no one thinks of it as a drug any more.

"One of these things is not like the others..."

What are the harmful effects of a full blown coffee addiction? Headaches?


What are the effects of an LSD addiction? Oh you can't, because LSD is anti–addictive. But it's still schedule 1 while coffee is uncontrolled.

Or sugar?

You can only let that go so far, because at the end of the day you need to pay the military to keep you in power.


In the long run we're all dead. In the meantime, NK is still standing.


The rules are rather different when your economy is mostly oil - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrostate


No, it depends on whether they have an ownership stake in what they’re funding or not.


All a matter of if the project dies when the money fountain runs dry, and developers have to find another way to pay bills other than a few meagre donations.


Ok sure, but now you’re just describing something completely different.


Nope, it is still the community getting funding out of somewhere.


> The lesson is that you should stop caring about breaking people’s code who go against the documentation this way. When it breaks you shrug. Their code was always buggy and it just happened to be working for them until then. You are not their dad. You are not responsible for their misfortune.

Sure, but good luck running a business with that mindset.


Apple is pretty successful.


It's fully supported as of version 139[0], so since ~June of last year.

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...


What?


Not sure about the second paragraph, but about first one I kind of agree with "someone else paying the hidden cost". I believe Google, Amazon, Roku, etc. basically pay the ODMs to manufacture the TV for them, and market the devices with affordable prices to acquire more users, in order to gain more usage data from consumers.


Their point most likely is that there's a lot of nasty chemicals and toxic emissions associated with any kind of large scale manufacturing, particularly when semiconductors are involved - the Silicon Valley is by far the US' largest agglomeration of Superfund sites for a reason.

Other countries, particularly China, are known for much laxer standards and even more timid enforcement of these - of course, the generations after ours will have to live with the contamination, but for now, they can produce for far, far lower costs than Western countries with environment and labor protection laws and decent enforcement.

And another thing... advertisers. Good luck finding a non-smart TV these days, you gotta pay a significant premium for what's known as "digital signage" (assuming that you can even get models actually usable). Normal consumer TVs and monitors? They're sold at a loss or near-loss price because the real profit is from the continuous (!) stream of ads over the life time of the device, plus analytics over the content that the users consume.


You know AI is a great solution that will succeed on its own merits when people need to be told it's "inevitable".


Yeah but by the time that revolution is here, the contract will have ended.


The contract ends in 2083 (58 years), which even by conservative estimates is well after cars will be able to self-park


How do any of those things fit that definition?


Code can fit the definition. Genetic algorithms.


Yep.

People always come up with people-centric definitions. They need to be updated based on what are the fundamental characteristic of something that is alive.

The current, more standard definition, seems to be based on metabolism. I disagree and argue for reproduction and evolution.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: