The business geniuses of intel bought Altera for nearly $17B in 2015. Now sold control at valuation barely half of that. After official inflation of over 30% during that time. Which means it lost over 2/3 of its value, (take into account also the lost interest on that money). Given that they gave up control for half the money, it’s effectively as if it was relinquished for 1/3 of what Intel paid for it.
So far - no one of the responsible Intel execs paid any price for such atrocious loss of stakeholders’ value. They need to be in jail and lose their personal wealth to repay the stockholders.
The SEC should investigate them, see whether there was any inside trading to benefit from this horrible value loss.
This criminal lack of performance needs to be brought up during the upcoming shareholders meeting. Responsible must pay the price.
Would you hire again the Intel CEOs, head of Intel Capital, any members of Intel’s board of directors after such abysmal performance?
Yes. It is IRS is deliberately dragging its feet to make it a real option for millions and millions of Americans. So that the near monopoly Intuit can rake in billions in sales each year.
Have you tried image to LaTeX translation? It works fairly well already for text plus equations.
I've done this for a 30-page manuscript with no sources, and I was able to recreate the entire document with minimal manual intervention to get a correct PDF.
This is not programming, it's OCR and translation to a very simple markup language. It's a very easy mechanical task.
Well, I hope that if they do so, the FSF and all copyright holders of the Open Source software used to make Android Great In-the-First-Place will sue their a$$e$ off.
Very simple.
1. Orders of magnitude. Digital transactions can be billions in single transaction. While making large cash transactions in cumbersome and unrealistic.
2. Because they can. Regulating digital transactions is simple. Regulating cash - next to impossible.
You are confusing randomization, a legitimate security mechanism, with security by obscurity. ASLR is not security by obscurity.
Please spend the time on understanding the terminology rather than regurgitating buzz words.
I understand the terminology. I even took a graduate course on the subject. I stand by what I wrote. Better yet, this describes ASLR when the AnC attack applies:
The SEC should investigate them, see whether there was any inside trading to benefit from this horrible value loss.
This criminal lack of performance needs to be brought up during the upcoming shareholders meeting. Responsible must pay the price.
Would you hire again the Intel CEOs, head of Intel Capital, any members of Intel’s board of directors after such abysmal performance?