Would love to know myself, I recall there was some plugin for VSCode that did next edits that accepted a custom model but I don't recall what it was now.

Did the Shah also order that virgins be raped before they are executed so they don't go to heaven, or is this equivalence entirely false?

Notice how hard people work to burry reports of atrocities that are committed by the Islamic Republic. Things are not what they appear.

1,000 of people are being executed in Iran. 10,000 of people are being mutilated and injured. 1,000 of executions are planned — but you are somehow worried about the US's role more than this?

Fascinating.

Nothing says legitimacy like having to shoot people en masse in the street

It's so strange. There is a real place on Earth which is much more brutal and oppressive than the wildest fantasy that Margaret Atwood could come up with. A place that rapes virgins before executing them to prevent them from entering heaven, a place that uses sexual violence and mutilation to control women, but if anyone mentions this place or the atrocities occurring there, then a certain element in the west gets incredibly upset and tries to divert attention away from it back to some US domestic local news interest stories. Almost like they are jealous or something.

Someone told me with a straight face once that we will one day come to see The Handmaid's Tale as a documentary and not just a novel. A statement that one can only make with a straight face if one is incredibly ignorant of the world.

I'm sure these US domestic pet peeves will exist even if some attention is given to the mass atrocities occurring in Iran. Not every local interest story in the US has to become international news. We really don't care.

then lets talk about Palestine, and the people commiting a genocide there, planning to "liberate" Iran useing the same methods

many of the people protesting the exectution of Renee Good, are carrying Palastinian, and Irainian flags, as they know the same people are behind ALL of our troubles.

This is, of course, exactly what's being talked about. The Kremlin, through the KGB, and the "socialist international" brought the Iranian mullahs to power and created the Palestinian movement. Both with the same purpose.

In case people don't realize the link between the two.

Both refer to the US (and Europe for that matter) as "the big satan" (meaning more important an enemy than Israel), showcasing their primary objective is to destroy US and more generally western influence. And actions against Israel are in service of that goal. Both Palestinians and Iranians are, to put it mildly, not shy about attacking and displacing population groups, including their own, and Palestinians aren't shy about using genocide to achieve it. Both have shown this extensively. The objective of these organizations is not better lives for Palestinians, Iranians, muslims or whoever. It's to get the US out of the middle east, and ideally do to the US what the US did to Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in WW2: starve the US of oil and with that energy.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB106419296113226300

Who's saying both aren't crap?

I reckon Netanyahu and the Ayatollah would've been good friends in another life.

It baffles me every time people put this opinion forward. For me, every time I see allies of the Kremlin (ayatollahs, palestinians), and allies of the US (ie. Israel), I assume they won't get along.

Can't remember the last time that was wrong.

One quite obvious difference between those two is that the Ayatollah seems to be fine with gunning down his own citizens.

Whatever is happening in Palestine will still keep happening even if someone once gives some attention to the atrocities in Iran. I promise you.

I also don't know who Renee Good is, and I don't care. Domestic US politics is not really my concern. 1,000 of people being executed because they don't like their theocratic overlords is actual international news.

From what I gathered, the Palestinians support the ayatollahs because Iran is the only country/organization that still backs their militants unconditionally.

Which is also a major source of anger in Iran proper. Not because of Palestine directly, but because the economy is terrible and the regime will still invest into its geopolitical games instead of domestic prosperity.

As of today, there is simply no exchange rate for Iranian rial to euro. The currency has entered some sort of black hole.

I don't think most Persians support Hamas, I would be really surprised if even half of the Persians in Iran support Hamas. I would guess they just don't care about some terror proxy of the regime that is oppressing them.

But sure, Islamo-fascist regimes and Islamo-fascist terrorists are natural allies.

and what of the more than 1000 people killed in Iran during the last zionist/emerican bombing run? what is happening now is the work up to another bombing run, but only after they get the "news" out about what to buy, and what to short

The amount of whataboutism to excuse paying no attention to Iran is very telling.

Israel's 12-day war resulted in casualties in Iran, so therefore, we should all ignore Iran murdering 1,000s of their own citizens.

It really says a lot about the narratives.

I don't think half the Iranian population support's the regime. Can you share the evidence for this claim?

Unfortunately he's probably right. It's a "better the devil you know" situation, and those institutionally and ethnically aligned with the regime fear its collapse more. From what I've read anyway.

This is not evidence of anything.

This kind of misses the point, though. I would say a much better rule is whatever runs in your workflows should also be entirely reproducible locally.

Even if you can ssh into the remote environment that does not cover things like authentication and authorization, you don't just git a GITHUB_TOKEN with the same permissions.

Exactly, you should be able to do everything locally! All this needing to SSH into runners or needing self-hosted runners or needing act to emulate GitHub Actions is really a failure of the developer experience.

A lot of stuff can be handled by developer themselves, but usually some steps are voluntarily blocked, like publishing to Google Play/App store.

You don't want anyone to be able to publish public facing app from their version of the code that might not be committed.

Some of us remember an era where deployment was copy-paste from the local /bin folder to the /bin folder on production server.

While I get some stuff you can't test locally, like 90%+ of complaints I see are for builds/tests. Which is really a failure of the engineers for not having a local feedback loop.

I am of the opinion you should be able to deploy from your machine, just you do not have the permissions to normally. So that if CI ever goes down and you need to push an emergency fix or something you can break glass if needed.

If you cannot build and run the application locally, I think there is something seriously, seriously wrong at the company. 90% of my day involves sitting in PHP storm with a debugger attached, introspecting whatever I need to. If I had to rely on even print statements being shit out on someone else's machine I don't know that I could be productive.

I agree, yet unfortunately most of the time I personally see people complaining it is about builds or tests unable to reproduce failures etc locally or unable to run end to end tests and have to push to CI to get them ran.

I guess the people Israel is murdering on a massive scale are generally noncitizens, but it's still not really in a position to throw stones.

Did you have a specific criticism?