Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fastasucan's commentslogin

Who is doing the work though, the student, chatgpt or claude?

Exactly. We all laughed at the cases where productivity was measured in lines of code. But now the whole world somehow optimize for it.

I did a degree in comp sci but my focus through my career is at the intersection of product design, economics and corporate finance/valuation whilst working with software engineers.

Im beginning to realise people who are too concentrated on one dimension (e.g software engineering) can’t see how things actually fit together. You only know what you know I guess.. but it’s blindly obvious to me.


But it should still add the tagline when copilot has been used, without direct approval by the user?

Who cares what it intends when they approve it and put into production?

>The fact that non-AI changes are attributed to Copilot is a bug.

But sneaking in the attribution to Copilot without approval was the feature?


>If what you described would make it to our PR queue, it would definitely not pass the gates

It just did though. Did you approve the PR without actually looking at the code?


I think this is spot on. "Every fault of america is just how it is in any society.". Nice way to just accept it.


Not very democratic to invade other countries on the whim of a president.


Actually, it is.


Are you a terrorist if you attack an invading force during a war?


Yes, for the sole reason that it's just a label assigned by an invading enemy government.

The problem is that the label is used in media to assign moral judgement, when it's just a political proscription that is typically assigned for entirely geopolitical reasons. Almost every country occupying a foreign territory, or is engaged in war with a group, or even another country, calls military action of the other side terrorism.

It doesn't mean anything. If it is to carry a moral judgement, it needs to be based on universally applied principles. It takes 5 seconds of thinking to see that it's absolutely not based on universally applied principles.


Terrorists specifically target civilian or government targets to make a statement or a demand. Those Iraqis were targeting American soldiers. The term doesn't apply here, no matter how badly the occupier wants to impose it on those defending their country.


Why do you say oddly? Prescribing antibiotics just because is how you get resistance.


Prescribing antibiotics for contagious bacterial infections is their exact usage.

Some doctors argue against using antibiotics for strep, but it's definitely debatable.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: