Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | evanjonr's commentslogin

This comment is pretty amusing, seeing as Apple "Sherlocked" Watson with the predecessor to Spotlight


Good video, unfortunately it is region locked on YouTube, but not on CBS's website https://cbsnews.com/video/meet-the-man-who-strings-roger-fed...

For anyone interested in stringing their own rackets/racquets you can pick up cheap machines that do a really good job, and you can customise however you like.


Does it scale correctly on windows yet? Is that part of QT6?


We made an app in Qt 5 (all QML) that scales well on Windows, so I don't know what the problem would be.

We did have to add special cases for font sizes on Windows, because auto-sized fonts looked like shit there, whereas on Mac they looked fine.


6.0 scales correctly for me on win 11.


Yes. Passive income can initially take work to build the income source. Most people consider rent to be passive income, yet people don't just magically own houses, they more often than not work to buy them.


Anyone that thinks renting houses is passive income has never done it.

Repairs, collections, advertising, evictions, etc.


...which are things you do every now and then, unlike a job, where you have to be there 5/7 days for a number of hours ?


But all of this is something you can contract out to an agency for a cut of the rent.


That cut of the rent ends up being around all of the cash flow for a newly bought property, and in many markets ends up being more than the initial cash flow. It’s a second job with irregular on-call.


Well, then you've leveraged too highly. Estate agents here take a fairly small percentage of the rent to manage all of this, so it takes a fairly small deposit before your rental income less management fees can't cover the remaining mortgage.


Property management companies in the US take somewhere in the 8-12% range. Is it dramatically lower wherever you are?


Towards the low end of that, but even at 12% it just means you can afford lower leverage.


People do magically own houses. It's called inheritance.


Do you think houses are most commonly inherited or worked for?


Did you mean FTTC instead of FTTN? FTTN can rarely get close to the max of 100/40 in best case scenarios.


I did indeed, thanks. Too many acronyms!


It would probably be easier to remain ignorant if you didn't join in conversation about it.


Having to login to Twitter to read a thread is really annoying.


I know this is an overused trope but I have had enough of every social media platform becoming increasingly hostile and annoying. It's like they have hit the cap of how many people on the planet are actually interested in signing up for twitter and now have to tighten the screws on every aspect to try to force the last bits of possible growth.

Dumb question I know, but why can't we just have platforms that are satisfied with what they are and not expect constant growth at any cost.


Yep, platforms are getting silly. On Reddit the other day I got the usual popup about accepting cookies, but once clicked, instead of just setting the cookie it showed a popup saying that I need to switch to the new theme to accept cookies. As in, I'm forced to use their new theme just to click a button and then switch back to using the old theme (like any sane person).


> like any sane person

I wonder if the sluggish UX that comes with a heavy JS SPA cuts into their sales.

I spend more time on HN now, though I was a heavy Reddit user, because Reddit users on the new UI being able to comment with images cramp my well-thought-out arguments.


Because if you do, your competitors won't, and will poach your customers with hard sell techniques until they reach a network effect required to make you irrelevant.

In the long run, there can be only one, the little diversity we have is the effect of national network effects established in the first years of growth that proved hard to overcome, especially Twitter in US. Without US, Twitter will be steamrolled and you will only have exotic alternatives like vkontakte and weibo.


That’s a good point. If I had to guess, I think over time there is a natural limit to the amount of user saturation. People are mostly aware of the platforms and their features and have probably made up their minds as to whether they want to join. Parts of the existing user base are probably getting sick of the engagement and lessening their usage.


I mentioned this elsewhere, and I don't mean to copy-paste, but take a look at some public nitter instances if this is a problem you regularly run into: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances

Nitter allows viewing threads like these without logging in or even enabling Javascript. For example, this post's thread can be viewed at both https://twitr.gq/joelburgess/status/1428008043556622336 and https://nitter.42l.fr/joelburgess/status/1428008043556622336.

Nitter has donation links on both Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/nitter) and Liberapay (https://liberapay.com/zedeus). Unfortunately, there isn't a way to donate to public instances that I'm aware of, but the software itself is worth supporting.


I should also mention Privacy Redirect as an add-on to automatically redirect you to nitter, openstreetmaps, invidious and others: https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect

I especially like how it replaces Youtube embeds with invidious embeds.


I'd given up even clicking twitter links anymore because I'd get stuck in a "you have to enable js/you have to login" dead end... this is brilliant - I'd never heard of it before. Thanks for pointing it out!


You don't need to - I've just read it in incognito (firefox focus).

Agree on the terrible UI tho


A similar probably more well presented site: https://float.exposed/0x40490fdb


It's certainly got more information but that combined with the "exact" values makes it a bit overwhelming/hard to understand, especially if you're trying to get a feel for it the first time and the half and the double have the same number of digits on screen. It's almost made more for investigation of something you ran across or need to hardcode than gaining intuition.

But most importantly I think best feature of the one in the submission is something it doesn't even mention in the description - it has a "click and drag to write bits" feature that I think is much easier to use/follow than the 2 dragging section on that one.


The 2-dragging section is much more efficient if you want to roughly pick arbitrary floats, and gives a better spatial map of the range of possible floats.

The individual bit flips also can be useful. It really depends what you want to use it for.


You can click to flip individual bits on float.exposed too, and they don't have “the same number of digits”…?


They do have the same number of decimal digits displayed. You can see it by clicking between "float" and "double": the decimal representation stays the same.


What is wrong with that?


It makes it look like they have the same precision (well also, going from 64 to 32 bits zeros out a whole lot, which contributes to that impression). In fact, both decimal representations are usually truncated, and don't accurately represent the binary floating point number. It's a neat and useful tool regardless, and I'm being a bit pedantic.


Click and flip one yes, click and drag many no.


I've been after something like this for a while. It would be nice if you could position fields with x and y coords. So you can line things up easier.

Also being able to preview text settings as you create templates would be nice.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: