Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | eddythompson80's commentslogin


It’s the other way around AFAIK. Insurance pays for what’s categorized as a disorder by the DSM. Or did I misunderstand your statement?

Curious why you copy/paste your previous comments verbatim[1]. I was reading it and could have sworn I have read that exact comment before and was thinking it's dejavu.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44438131


Haha, I had the exact same feeling, like I had read the same comment before. Glad to know I’m not losing my mind :)

maybe an automated bot

Not sure, their comment history doesn't look like it. If I had to guess, they got a fair amount of karma from the old comment and thought they could get away with reusing it and harvesting some more.

Obsidian has a git plugin that works on all platforms I tried it on (Windows, Linux, Mac and iOS). So I just have a private repo that syncs all the devices through git.

For iOS, the "hard" part is getting the initial git clone, but after that whenever you open the app you can pull/push any changes or set it to automatically do that on a schedule.

To setup a git repo on an iOS device you need iSH[1] but you can delete it the initial `git clone`. The plugin can handle it from there. Make sure to use https and a token that doesn't expire as part of your git clone url. Here is a guide[2]

The only thing to keep in mind is to have a .gitignore that excludes some of .json config files in .obsidian folder as they often cause conflicts. I exclude workspace.json and workspace-mobile.json which just define what tabs you have open on a given device so I think it makes sense to keep that device specific and not commit it.

[1] https://ish.app/

[2] https://forum.obsidian.md/t/mobile-sync-with-git-on-ios-for-...


Are you referring to PEG stock price or actual profit? Because their profits growth hasn’t really “greatly exceeded” inflation. Here is the last 30 years of profits[1] (you can change it to YoY to see how much their growth over the last 5 years is). They in fact posted a loss in 2021 and under performed 2022. They shot up in 2023 and then down to pre-pandemic levels in 2024.

They are not what I’d call a profitable company. I think their stock is reflecting the AI bubble as plenty of people are speculating on power companies

[1] https://www.roic.ai/quote/PEG/financials


At least the comments there are better than the article


how do you think any ban works exactly?

When prostitution is banned, do you think they install a cop in every bedroom to make sure there is no money exchange?

When drugs are banned, do you think they put a device in every person that beeps if they ingest drugs and a SWAT team Air drops on their house?

When a harmful business practices are banned, do you think a member of a regulatory body gets to attend or review every meeting and decision in every company to make sure that practice doesn't happen?

When graffiti is banned, do you think a cop joins you when you buy a spray can until you dispose of it?

When vaping on airplanes is banned, do you think they do a cavity search on every passenger to make sure no one is sneaking a juul and puffing into a towel?

When dumping industrial toxic waste into rivers is banned, do you think we install 4k cameras on all rivers to track whats being dumped there?

If this is your first time in a human society, welcome. Unlike math, nothing we do in society is a 100%, but we've been doing it for 10,000 years. You will demand "unenforceable" laws if you like them and scoff at ones you don't like. You already know how and will fit right in.


> The more tools like Claude Code are used, the more training they receive as well.

What do you mean? A model doesn't improve because it's being used more. Are you saying Anthropic invests more into Claude Code the more people use it? Or are you saying they collect its output and train it on it?


They probably mean https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement_learning_from_hu..., but I don't think that is a huge factor for Claude Code.

I assume they mean that they can gather users inputs (e.g. the user correcting the model, suggesting improvements, etc.).


Beavers like to do that to rivers too. I don't know if they have a Secret Service equivalent. I think some do it for economical reasons but the majority do it out of boredom.


> why is the context returned from the errgroup instead of being an attribute?

It's a go style thing[1]. "Dont store context in a struct" is the general advice. Anybody seeing a ctx in a struct will flag the PR. I think golangci-lint does too.

The claim is that its confusing. Also you'll never see any std lib apis doing that. People just assume its a bad idea and don't do it. There are situations where it makes sense. Like operations that are described by a struct and you want to attach their context to those structs. A Boland developer will tell you "you're thinking in Java/Python/C#/JavaSctipt/etc you need to think in Go" and yes you can always rewrite the whole thing to be more go-like as in errgroup API. But it's just a style thing.

[1] https://go.dev/blog/context-and-structs


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: