Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | disposekinetics's commentslogin

You're abetting the destruction of free speech through while you battle strawmen.


Canada has had laws against hate speech before c-36, this extends those laws to the internet.

Canada does not have a concept of "free speech", the fuck are you talking about. Canada has a concept of freedom of expression, which has certain limits, such as Hate speech.

I'm so sorry you will no longer be able to call for a genocide against a group you hold prejudices against, boo fucking hoo.


Laws against hate speech are fundamentally censorious. You approve of censorship when it happens to people you dislike. You're just unprincipled.

If homosexuals have their rights ignored in some far off country you must just shrug your shoulders, they don't have rights in those countries.

Tilting at windmills under the delusion they are giants does not make you a fighter of giants.


I feel like there has been a whole targeted campaign against SF recently. Am I seeing faces in clouds?


But isn't it good that companies shop around for the cheapest tax rate?


In what sense is it good that a company can make profit through a business activity in some country, but instead of paying the tax there, it pays it somewhere else?


Competition in economics is the incentive that has brought the majority of westerners from <$1/day to what we are today - with washing machines, cars, and water toilets no king could previously dream of.

Companies compete for shareholders by satisfying as many customers as possible. If states can compete for the best deal for international business, companies can better serve people, and those states can house centres of international trade.

It’s not just abstract talk, but incentives that drive us to live different everyday lives than people in guild-economy medieval times, or past slave economies, or how people lived in the GDR or other eastern bloc countries.


The corporation that uses the roads and operates under the safety of the police and military of a country should not be paying some other country, it barely has anything to do with, a lower tax due to some accounting shenanigans.


> serve people

You wanted to write “shareholders”, right?


It minimizes the amount of taxes paid overall, which weakens the state.


this is a benefit only international corporations get to enjoy, which gives them an unfair advantage in the market.

if your goal is to have a few conglomerates rule the world, then this is a good way to do it. Not sure how that is much different from a powerful "state" though


How is weakening the state a good thing?


State leaders have no incentive to create value, but rather to keep power.

Companies must create valuable things people want, or be out of business in a very short time.


State leaders have an incentive to get reelected. Companies are only beholden to their shareholders which represent a tiny fraction of the population.


Companies are also beholden to their customers. For all its faults, that does result in some good products.


Now they can still shop around, but probably on all the benefits they will receive.


Good for who? The shareholders? The country that's creating the profits? The country where the company is based?


The big one in the news right now is voting, but Jimmy Carter formed the department of education at a federal level.


The most important think is if Amazon workers want to unionize.


Why is that. I don't want my tax dollars going to welfare for their workers. I have skin in that game.


Why would governments magically stop subsidizing Amazon if their workers unionized?


There are plenty of reasons to support unions, but this sort of corporate welfare could be eliminated by increasing the minimum wage.


Paying people minimum wage is "corporate welfare"? How so?


Because the alternative is the taxpayer winds up paying for those workers’ healthcare, food and housing (Medicaid, SNAP and Section 8 vouchers).


You're forgetting the alternative where the person ends up getting unemployed instead, in which case the taxpayer pays 100% for those workers’ healthcare, food and housing.


It isn't a binary, the question is the right representation as much as anything else.


Would that this were the most important thing in the Amazon unionization effort. We would maintain measures like an actual election with secret ballots — instead of card check, where the Teamsters can see if you've signed the card, and pressure you if you haven't.

The Biden administration, I understand, wishes the return of card-check.


I totally agree. I support the theory behind unions, but the practices by employers and unions make me wish for less coercion all around.


Look on the bright side: it used to be a whole lot worse.

I mean on both sides, too. The Pinkerton thugs get all the press, and are rightly condemned, but for coverage of the union men beating their non-union colleagues to death with clubs, blinding a man with thrown stones, I refer you to coverage such as McLure's Magazine article The Right To Work (1903) which gave its name to the type of law: http://moses.law.umn.edu/darrow/documents/Right%20to%20work....

I like the distinction that it draws at the beginning, too:

"PUBLIC opinion seems to be coming around to the view that the trades' union is here to stay. From many unexpected quarters we hear every now and then a more generous acknowledgment that the organization of labor is not only as inevitable as the combination of capital, but a good thing in itself. At the same time, and from the same fair minds, you hear expressions of passionate indignation at the abuse of power by unions. This means that public opinion is beginning to distinguish between unionism and the sins of unionists, as it is between organized capital and the sins of capitalists."

All we have to contend with today, here, are the vengeful downvotes.


I'm not an expert on US union law, but AFAICS, American workers have a choice between card check, which in principle allows intimidation by unions, and the NLRA process, which has been documented as enabling intimidation by employers. Do you have another proposal?


I like the way it was put. I love unions but I'm frustrated by the 'sins of unionists'


This was expected as soon as Biden appointed a union machine boss as Secretary of Labor.


Conversely if you keep your site simple enough the user can apply styling as needed.


I feel like you're conflating civilization and government.


I relied very heavily on Day One until they dropped most of their local-hosting features. It was painful and I still haven't found any comparable alternative.


Wow, I didn't realize they did that... I've had Day One suggested to me many time and always resisted, I guess I'm glad I did. I don't know what I want as an alternative, though - I guess what would be ideal is something that is Desktop/Mobile, syncs markdown to a shared filesystem like Dropbox, and has lots of optional bells and whistles for cataloguing and organization that I wouldn't mind losing since I'd still have the actual content in markdown.


I tried. There isn’t one. Dyrii was decent. But it was abandoned. There’s Journey (with their cluttered and poor interface) but they’ve not been able to pull themselves out of Google’s sink-hole. Even after you login with Apple Login they ask you to add a Google Drive account to sync data.

So I literally just moved back to pen and paper. Something I had been doing since school (school school). I haven’t missed any journaling app since. But having one would be nice.


How about Joplin? (https://joplinapp.org/)


Great idea. Joplin is a really good note taking app, open source, free and you can easily sync it via webdav.

It's not a journaling app per se, but you could use it for that.

The mobile apps are not perfect yet though.


Still running an 8 year old version for that reason. Tried switching to MacJournal once it became free but kept going back.


Same. I still use the old app on my iPhone. Syncing to Dropbox and iCloud no longer works. I periodically export to pdf as a backup. I have nine years of notes in that pdf.

At some point an iOS update is going fully break the app, but I'm still hanging on.


I wish I could say the same for my home country.


Same thing with forest fires. In the last 10 years we stopped any sort of fire mitigation, and we have seen the fires get far worse.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: