> VIPS instead surmises that, after WikiLeaks' Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016 his intention to publish Hillary Clinton-related emails, the DNC rushed to fabricate evidence that it had been hacked by Russia to defuse any potential WikiLeaks disclosures.
This is laughably stupid. Why would attributing the hack to Russia instead of Wikileaks or whatever make any difference to the contents of the hacks?
Yeah, I read about Morris worm a year later in my networking textbook. It was a good feeling to realize what I have done was similar in nature.
Of course, Morris worm was a real technical exploit (buffer overflow was involved IIRC)
Mine was nowhere comparable to that in sophistication.
SO many fake passports... I bet she was an East German spy. People in such a line of work usually don't have labels in clothes, because the labels might not match the rest of the story.
To be fair, I don't have labels in my clothes because they irritate me so much. Oddly, it never used to be a problem but it has become one in the last five or six years.
(I don't have any fake passports, though, and my medications do have their printed labels.)
In some languages, it makes sense to add the "bell", otherwise the sentence is incomplete.
In my native Hindi, you would say "X's ship's bell". If you drop the the "bell", it becomes "X's ship". Obviously it's not a ship. And if you drop the "ship", it becomes "X". That would mean the bell's name is "X". So the only complete, logical sentence has to be "X's ship's bell".
From a US perspective: The world is changing. The (American) ideal of a McMansion with a 2.5 kids and 3 cars is gone. People want to live in cities; in particular, tolerant, safe, cultured cities. Old timers in San Francisco (where I live) will blame the "tech boom" and "techies" for this phenomenon, but it's not limited to tech, and is not caused by tech. It's just the cycle we are in currently.
Given the accuracy, could it read your fingerprints while you're doing the gesture? From the paper, it looks like the average displacement accuracy is 0.4mm. I wonder if that's accurate enough to read your fingerprints. If it could, you could ensure that only your gestures are recognized and not someone elses!
Well, resolution for fingerprint scanners is roughly 500 dpi [0]; 1 in^2 = 645 mm^2; so.. maybe, I'm not sure!
But, that said, I believe there are many >1 mm^2 resolution features that can basically uniquely identify users, like, the shape of a hand (individual finger geometry, etc), the length of a limb, the particular subcutaneous layout of veins, face geometry, etc. It's interesting to ponder about, at least!
Currently looking around for cheap (and arduino-amenable) single chip radar systems whereby I might try to hack together a more low tech prototype of Soli
This is laughably stupid. Why would attributing the hack to Russia instead of Wikileaks or whatever make any difference to the contents of the hacks?