Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | datavirtue's commentslogin

They are very much devaluing their currency. This is all the rage and I expect a currency devaluation race as the US tries to deal with crushing government liabilities.

It's not just China and the USA. Pretty much all countries want to devalue their currency to improve their balance of trade in a race to the bottom. Logically not everyone can win the race.

Someone needs to figure out the best hack for what to do with high value currency.

Isn’t it to sell home currency denominated debt…?

I think it just turns into table stakes.

This. People want to act like they aren't the government when it does something stupid.

Voters have basically no power, and very little incentive to even bother voting wisely. There is abundant evidence that your vote does not matter, and to pretend otherwise is fantasy.

Okay but again — be pissed at the government for making bad loans in the first place, not for writing them off when it is impossible for them to be repaid.

Why would you claim evidence and not cite any?

Those of us who voted for the current President have seen him do so much of what he told us he would with so much progress. Even his opponents claim he's done dozens to fifty things in office that they wish didn't happen. Even they agree he's getting a lot done. So, he's proof that our vote counted.

I'd rather have a person following Christ with godly character. That plus not taking a bribe and having skill at leading are the Bible's standard for picking rulers. Americans filter them for these rich, elitist egomaniacs. Then, we have to pick the lesser evil on policy grounds until that stops. God works even through the wicked to bless us in some ways, though. That's the bright side.


Trump's character is not what a person following Christ should be. Just his remark that "they let you do anything" to women when you're rich and famous should be evidence of that, let alone the personality cult around him that he built, and the hundreds or thousands of things he's said since 2016.

I agree on character. His policies lined up more with what we needed, though. While, the Democrats actively censor Christ, the Bible, and people sharing the Gospel ("hate speech" or "harassment") while promoting sins in Romans 1 as public policy and in education. The sins they promote are the same ones that keep showing up in the Old Testament before God destroys that nation.

We wanted God, ability to share Christ, the Word, and less sins that get nations destroyed. We got that. We saw both politicians and people on the news praise Jesus for the first time in a long tine. We also saw companies, like Meta, reversing censorship policies they used against Christians and conservarives. That affects me since I lost accounts in big communities just for mentioning Jesus or God's Word.


Oh man as someone who is concerned about the censorship and in favor of religious freedom, I really wish we could have a serious discussion about this, but HN probably isn’t the place. Are the sins you’re referring to mainly centered around sexuality, e.g. homosexuality? What happened to caring about adultery, maliciousness, perjury, faithlessness, boastfulness, arrogance, slander and deceit? Those are all things Trump has done and continues to do. Trump’s “character” happens to cover a pretty big subset of the sins mentioned in Romans 1. I’m very curious why people believe Trump’s claims that he’s on the side of Christians, given how often and how severely he misrepresents the truth in order to serve his own power. It is obviously pandering, and as such is deceitful in the name of religion. Doesn’t that concern you gravely? Doesn’t his selling bibles with his name on it, and with gold and camo covers, do anything for you? To me it seems extremely crass, gross, and disrespectful to God, Christ, and the Bible.

You're talking about one person. All the politicians I've seen are wicked. I said plenty often that they should be replaced with people pf godly character. Until then, working with who is in the race (eg Harris vs Trump), have to vote for nobody by that standard. If voting for policy, we look at policies rather than the politician.

Progressives have been, at an institutional level, censoring the Gospel as hate speech or harassment, mocking God in media, promoting idolatry/universalism, pushing fornication, promoting child murder (abortion) even financially, pushing LGBT even in elementary school, and recently systematic discrimination against entire groups. They also defend Palestine over Israel when they have to pick a side. They also export sexual immorality to other countries via media and political deals which is exactly what Revelation warns about in Rev. 17:2.

The Old Testament shows these same traits... especially idolatry, child murder, and ditching Biblical marriage for perversion... being common threads for the destruction of nations. That Progressives promote these on a policy level, but mock and fight God's design and the Gospel, means we have a clear choice. One party, who is merely pandering, will at least let us share Christ, protect babies from murder, and reverse other damaging trends. Those trends are happening now but didn't under Biden/Harris or Obama.


They’re not merely pandering, though, they are swearing by The Lord’s name falsely. Why is it a good thing to vote for them when their stated plan is an active (and immoral) deceit to fake Godliness and trick you into empowering them, and convince you their opponents are immoral and evil? Don’t you worry this is a Trojan horse, that you’re inviting in Satan disguised as an angel of light to your sanctuary? Anyway, it’s working, which is why you already know that it’s not just one person we are talking about, right? You’re talking about voting for a ruling political party on religious grounds, a party that is using your religious views to sway your political opinion. They do not share your views in Christ, they are weaponizing Christianity more successfully than anyone else ever has.

Personally I worry about the fact that Republican fiscal policy is actively harmful to supporting the lives of the children who are being saved by the abortion ban. Why are we cherry picking only the pre-birth side of a pro life agenda? Why aren’t they pro- the already born living? Their fiscal policies are actively and intentionally harmful to the poor and actively against sharing costs and establishing social safety nets. To me it feels extremely un-Christ-like to spread so much hate and division and pretend to care about Christians.

I’m not sure we’re going to reach one another constructively, but I remain intensely curious how and why Republicans are so successful at this when they are certainly working against the interests of pious people like you. It’s very interesting that democrats are being successfully vilified and painted as pure evil when their fiscal policy is traditionally firmly on the side of loving thy neighbor in the way God meant it when speaking to Moses, while conservative policy is firmly on the side of stripping the vineyard bare and leaving nothing for the sojourner, of keeping the hired workers wages all night, of not caring for one another. Their policies are designed to benefit the ultra rich at the expense of the poor, and this is a damaging trend that is accelerating.


The infrastructure was built with borrowed federal money that was likely never paid off. Then you need to maintain that infrastructure with local taxes. There isn't enough tax revenue to maintain all of it. Run the numbers.

When we built that infra the workers didn't have health insurance and they didn't need it because they could afford their own healthcare out of pocket. Some things have changed.


Yeah, NPR is on a rapid course to becoming the third leg to FOX and CNN.


You forgot freedom and dignity. There is one source for that in the world, the US.

You can flail all day but you won't be able to point to another power that preserves that chance for everyone.


That's impressively ahistorical. How many times have they overthrown a democracy in favour of a US-aligned dictatorship, now?

Iran was a functioning, secularizing democracy until the CIA got involved.


I live somewhere that exemplifies "another power that preserves that chance for everyone".

Streets around here are paved with small brass plaques to remind people of what happens if you fail to preserve that for everyone.


You must be new here. No joking allowed.


AFAIU, that is basically true? Isn't it in the guidelines somewhere? Sarcasm or (exclusive-or!) really good humor get a pass in practice.


I think it’s a matter of style or finesse. If you can make it look good, even breaking the rules is socially acceptable, because a higher order desire is to create conditions in individuals where they break unjust rules when the greater injustice would be to censor yourself to comply with the rules in a specific case.

Good artists copy, great artists steal.

Good rule followers follow the rules all the time. Great rule followers break the rules in rare isolated instances to point at the importance of internalizing the spirit that the rules embody, which buttresses the rules with an implicit rule to not follow the rules blindly, but intentionally, and if they must be broken, to do so with care.

> I have spread my dreams under your feet;

> Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aedh_Wishes_for_the_Cloths_of_...


See.


I can fully believe one can be funny in a way that isn’t validated or understood, or even perceived as humorous. I’m not sure HN is a good bellwether for comedic potential.


If you don’t adhere to the guidelines we’ll send mean and angry emails to dang.


> If you don’t adhere to the guidelines we’ll send mean and angry emails to dang.

That’s so weird, you’re on! That makes two of us! When I don’t adhere to the guidelines, I also send mean and angry emails to dang. Apologies in advance, dang.


Herding cats.


You are supposed to be an adult and ignore all that biased rhetoric.


The calculations are 100% transparent. Reminds me of the red hat crowd bleeting about how the numbers are "adjusted." Like it's some kind of conspiracy. It's all well known. If you understand it and choose not to like it, well ignore it and cook up your own stat. You can find the formulas and get the data. No secrets.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: