Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | danielhep's comments login

This is random, but I’m wondering why if you’re both Spanish why use miles and not km?


I’m not sure such a prediction is valid in a world post Pax Americana.


That post pax world isn't inbound anytime soon, despite the irrational hysteria going on right now. Trump has 3.x years remaining. People are acting like he's going to remain for decades. There is no next Trump, he has a unique hold over the MAGA base that was key to his election.

For now post Pax America is merely a fantasy that reveals a lot about the people that think it's happening now (they're showing their personal preference). The same things were said due to Trump's first term also. Instead the US got more powerful and far richer in the time since then.

Back in reality, the 1860s, 1930s and 1970s were worse for the US than anything going on now. The 1930s were drastically worse. The US as superpower has survived far worse than Trump and it'll do it again.


If I were to bet between Dems being able to return in 2028, or the entire MAGAified (and DOGEified) system being rigged to put Vance (or some other couchfucker) there, I'd bet the latter.

Is voter disfranchisement a thing? Will the US have more of it? Will the "activist judges" brought in by the MAGA party let it happen? All of the above?


Trump will go away at some point (hopefully he does not seek a 3rd term). However, i am concerned about the fact that the GOP has been mired in the MAGA culture for a decade now, and what that does to the people seeking membership and the people being promoted to leadership. When Trump leaves, the people which have been promoted and been successful in GOP under him still stays. For what virtues are you being promoted for in the GOP? The entire structure is corrupted.


There is no next Trump, there will be a next Putin. America will be poor. You cannot rule out it will be in expansion wars.

It is not about MAGA, they were a tool, they are not critical anymore. You are looking at a new fascist rule, with complete state capture. It is not completely done yet, and there is still a change the coup will fail. But people are complying out of fear, the military leadership has been purged and cleansing is still going on everywhere. So the window of opportunity is closing.

Do not focus on Trump. He is a Chaos Actor and he will be disposed of when he can't deliver of is not needed anymore.

  >  post Pax America is merely a fantasy
I recommend reading the news, preferably outside of the USA.

  > they're showing their personal preference
This is an example of a binary belief trap.


I mean it was all laid out in front of everyone...

https://www.project2025.observer


He has already screamed bloody murder about an election not going his way, and recent Supreme Court decisions about basic stuff (i.e. the government must honor its contractual obligations) have been 5-4.

All it will take is one more SC justice and we'll be in a full blown crisis. Yes, Trump isn't the worst president we've ever had - but he's kind of unique in that he clearly doesn't give a damn about the rule of law or the Republic as a government.


The spec only has the power it does because of the market share of Google’s browser though. More people using independent browsers means less power by google to single-handedly control the spec.


They can still control the spec. Ladybird would need a seat at the table to start the change there.

But if there is more browser diversity, and less support for Chrome Only things, maybe that starts (continues?) the path of Chrome becoming IE6


Basically noone other than browser vendors will look at the spec anyway. The reality is effectively descriptive, not prescriptive.

Sure, without having a majority marketshare a browser can't by itself push for their new features to be supported by other browsers, but they will effectively disincentivize website owners to not use features they don't support if they have marketshare of any significance. At which point it'd be in W3C's best interest to allow Ladybird to participate, or else their work gets underutilized.


You can always just ignore the spec, if you have a big enough market share.


Even in the US, every major city has overnight bus services. I live in Seattle and have taken the half hourly to hourly bus home at 3am before. It's wild to me that Tokyo has none.


I will say that there are businesses that has stepped out to fill this void: there are numerable “Internet/manga cafes”, that have private rooms where you have reclining chairs where you can nap; you can just rent a karaoke room for a couple of hours, some onsens have overnight options (including the same reclining chairs etc) - if you just want to have a semi-private space to nap, there are plenty of options.

Just coming home is difficult.


My day job is OpenTripPlanner work, so I absolutely love to see this. I've long thought about what a RAPTOR engine would look like written in Rust. So cool that you've done it. You should share this in the OTP Gitter chat if you haven't already, the people there would love to see it. I wonder if this would be small enough to run on a phone? I have thought about offline trip planning on a phone, but running OTP is out of the question as a graph can be gigabytes and take minutes to load.


It's after midnight here so take this with a grain of salt but the generated timetable for the puget sound is taking up about 40 MiB on-disk and the server process is using 100k of RAM I think. Most of the timetable is zero-copy so it can be memory mapped on a platform that supports it. So yes, I think it would run on a phone. See also mobroute, which powers Transito

https://git.sr.ht/~mil/mobroute

https://git.sr.ht/~mil/transito


Just curious, are you based in the Puget sound? I'm in Seattle so it would be a funny coincidence.


I sure am! Feel free to email me if you want, I'd love to chat about OTP, transit and maps in general.


I'm not sure how they do it, but Rail planner app for interrail has fully offline train planner.

https://www.eurail.com/en/plan-your-trip/rail-planner-app


Depends heavily on the city too. I think this kind of thing is more accepted in NYC and LA with big immigrant communities from countries with more informal economies, but in Seattle it gets shut down quickly.


Is using something other than XCode viable? I'd love to do more with swift but I hate that IDE.


Most editors will do, Xcode is mostly needed for iOS / macOS development if you want to submit to the App Store or work with a lot of Apple frameworks.


There is a Swift LSP. See - https://github.com/swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp



Have you used it recently, on an M series Mac? I used to feel the same, it was sluggish and crashed frequently. It's become usable now, even pleasant to use. Also it's great they support Vim keybindings now out-of-the-box.


If you're a Jetbrains user, they have their AppCode IDE.


That was discontinued in 2022.


Good read! I have a huge CRA app I maintain at work, and we've been wanting to migrate to something else for years now. will have to check this out.


beware for large apps, if you don't have heavily splitted your app with dynamic imports, vitejs is frustratingly slow by loading each ESM module separately. Seems that rspac has others interesting tradeoffs.

Works great once loaded though.


We have encountered that problem too. As far as I learnt from various sources that is caused by circular imports in some cases, and by using index files that re-export your modules in other.


[dead]


It hasn't been maintained for ages, so at some point you'll want to use some new dependency and find out that you can't. And it's very slow, too, if I recall correctly.


Not OP, but we had issues with SASS that made it difficult to upgrade. It didn't like the M1 architecture when trying to upgrade from Node 12 to Node 18, where as swapping it out for Vite just worked. Given CRA is deprecated, it made sense to move away. I followed a guide[0] which covered most of the things I needed to change and the remaining issues just involved following the build errors.

We also saw much-improved build times, which was a welcome change.

[0] https://cathalmacdonnacha.com/migrating-from-create-react-ap...


> If you build expensive stuff on the property you generally pay more.

This is not Land Value Tax. Georgism is an argument against this concept of taxing based on what you do with the land.


So, am I to understand that prime beach real estate is to be taxed the same as a plot in a desert or swamp? There is clearly a lot of trouble with taxing land, because an inherent part of its value is what you can do with it. People pay premium for land that is useful and desireable. The structures placed on land and the values thereof are proportional to this desirability and economic utility.

Furthermore, it might be necessary to use land for farming or warehouses when it is more profitably used for residential structures. A free market might eventually sort out higher food prices that can cover the taxes, but I think we can all agree that it's better to not arbitrarily increase taxes on a necessity like food.


> So, am I to understand that prime beach real estate is to be taxed the same as a plot in a desert or swamp?

Why would that be the case? A beachfront plot would likely have a higher value than a plot in a desert or swamp, so the tax levied on the beachfront plot’s value would, of course, be higher. It’s a tax on the land’s value, not a tax on the size of the plot.


The value of land is largely subjective. It is based on demand, among other things. If the government assigns arbitrarily high or low value to land based on hypothetical worlds where the land could be used for high rises, factories, or whatever as opposed to what economics has proven is the best actual use of the land and its best estimated price, that is just a terrible version of the same thing we have now.


Assessors observe market activity. The 'purchase price' when you buy land is based on the highest and best potential use of land. The "Land Value Tax" merely appropriates this observed value for public expense (and potential dividend distribution).

The fact that you compared 'prime real estate' to swampland or desert demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of ad valorem taxation and land rent generally. While the rate should be the same (ideally as close to 100% as we can get without causing issues) the actual -value- would be dramatically different.

Under your hypothetical question, the desert and/or swampland could very well have 0 rental value, which means the tax would collect 0 from these locations. 100% of $0 = 0.


Correct. In fact it’s the entire premise. If one doesn’t understand this fact then they do not understand literally anything about Georgism.

GP is woefully confused and so darn sure of it!


I'm using DuckDB to parse GTFS data, which comes in a CSV format. It works wonderfully.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: