Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dahdum's commentslogin

This is a great way to sidestep the political process to fund popular projects. The political constraints will ensure returns are middling, so unless they subsidize with tax breaks on dividend income I think it would be a poor commercial investment.

Whether its perfect or not, it almost has to be better than the current status quo.


How are you going to have a Sovereign Wealth Fund when you're in debt ~300% to GDP?

Are they going to fund their "wealth" with debt?

This is an oxymoron.

You aren't "rich" if you have $1M and you owe $4M. You're a con-man living a lie that will crush you eventually.

And by the way, if you have -$3M, sorry, but you're the last person I want to invest money with...

Norway gets to have a wealth fund because they have a small population with a massive amount of oil revenue, and they aren't run by morons.

Canada only produces about 2x as much oil as Norway, but it's got 10x the population. Sorry, you can't all be rich like Norwegians unless you start pumping 5x more oil.

Things like this should be laughed off the world stage.

We live in an upside down world.


>How are you going to have a Sovereign Wealth Fund when you're in debt ~300% to GDP?

This seems to be incorrect. Including federal, provincial and local, the debt is about 110% of the GDP.[1]

The US has 3x more debt per citizen than Canada.

[1] https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/...


> How are you going to have a Sovereign Wealth Fund when you're in debt ~300% to GDP?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_public_debt this article says it's 57% of GDP. Where are you getting your 300% from?


> You aren't "rich" if you have $1M and you owe $4M. You're a con-man living a lie that will crush you eventually.

I'm not sure the simile lands. If that $1M is financing a lavish lifestyle, then you are for all intents and purposes rich. As for the crushing down part, the modern economy shows us one can stay solvent longer than the market is irrational (especially true the more zeros are added to the numbers above).


GDP isn't wealth. This is closer to making $1M/year and owing $4 million.

GDP isn't the only measure of wealth. Canada has vast resources that act as collateral for the debt. You wouldn't be friends with a billionaire who only owns stock and lives mostly off the debt issued against that stock?

Canada has tens of trillions of dollars in natural resources it could choose to monetize at any time.

They use machine id, shouldn’t need the key to reactivate on reinstall.


But you can move your key across devices -- just de-register the old machine and register on the new one.

I bought a Windows Pro license a decade ago (maybe for Win7) and I'm still using the same license for Windows 11 on a new PC.


You’ve always been able to install and use without an account (oobe\bypassnro). As long as power users and businesses can avoid it, they have no real incentive to change.


Note on Current Status (2025/2026): Microsoft is actively removing this command in newer Windows 11 updates, especially in 24H2/25H2 and Insider builds. If oobe\bypassnro fails, the command is not recognized, or simply reboots without enabling the option, you must use alternative methods.


The command (oobe\bypassnro) still works in 25H2. There was some talk that they're going to remove it, but so far it hasn't happened.


The peak was right before they launched marketplace in my opinion (2013?). After that they had no incentive to improve Jira/Confluence, easier to take the marketplace cut. I could never understand why they couldn’t solve the speed issues though. It just got worse and worse.


Insane that NYT is driving this privacy nightmare.


And they are doing this over literally "old news". Expired for years, of no value.


Ofcourse the biased propaganda newspaper (i dont like fox news too) pretending to be defenders of liberty and the public, at it again !


Important to note their findings only apply to a smaller subset of people, and do not include those with the most need.

> The findings of the pilot project will be generalizable not to the entire German population, but to 21- to 40-year-old individuals in single-person households with middle incomes.

The reason:

> We were thus faced with the decision of selecting 122 people who represented the entire country but did not provide scientifically reliable data on the effects of a basic income, or selecting 122 people from a more limited group from whom we could draw definitive conclusions. In the end, we chose the latter.

https://www.pilotprojekt-grundeinkommen.de/en/blog/how-the-p...


That metallic taste still gives me shudders when I think about it, but I’m very grateful for Paxlovid.


It worked extremely fast for me, I took it within 16 hours of symptoms that were increasing rapidly. Within 6-8 hours I started feeling much better, instead just dealing with the Paxlovid side effects. I don’t think my body fought off Covid that fast. Anecdotal of course, but I’d take it again in a heartbeat. I did get a rebound infection the next week but I couldn’t feel it, just tested positive for a couple days.


> I took it within 16 hours of symptoms that were increasing rapidly. Within 6-8 hours I started feeling much better

So about 24 hours? I took nothing when I got COVID, and the major fever and body/head aches only lasted about that long. One day I started feeling absolutely awful, and I woke up the next day feeling substantially better but unable to smell anything but smoke for the next week.

It is possible that the paxlovid helped you, but given the few details you've shared so far it's also possible that it didn't do much that wasn't already going to happen.


It was dramatic and started just a few hours after the first dose. I was worsening all morning and by mid afternoon a reversal, coinciding with the Paxlovid side effects. It wasn’t an overnight thing where rest was a factor, I was awake and bedridden. So I’m pretty convinced, enough to drop $1,500 retail if need be in the future for it.


It’s the same in both, it was deliberate. Wikipedia lists a potential reason.

> The title “Wolfs”, a grammatically incorrect plural of Wolf, is an apparent reference to the character of Winston Wolfe (aka “Mr Wolf”) - an iconic “fixer” in the Quentin Tarantino film Pulp Fiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfs_(film)


I don’t buy it.


Well do you talk about Nissan Leafs, or Nissan Leaves? I'd probably use the former


I can’t say I often have cause to talk about multiple Nissans. Plus the car is called a Leaf.

Regardless of who is correct or not, the bus advert to me as a British person reads and scans as a spelling mistake or grammar error. Googling to find they’re allegedly talking about Winston Wolfe doesn’t remedy that problem. Plus that would be Wolfes.


It reads as a mistake to me as an American too, and I expect most of us. It’s an artistic choice.


Could be interesting once they have content but so far there is nothing there. The “Contact Us” page is a 404.



I don't know if it is AI generated, but the formatting (lists with bold text, unnecessary headers, lots of en and em dashes) is setting off my spidey senses.


I keep hearing this about em dashes. Why do people think only AI bots write with em dashes? I use them. In fact, a lot of people do. That's probably _why_ the AI bots use them. Because the training material does.


I'd rather they generated the content than waste my tax dollars handcrafting artisinal html.


> The “Contact Us” page is a 404.

It's a mailto: link with a typo.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: