It is my observation that the time good programmers spend validating (with full or master nodes) on projects designed to be decentralized can win web 3.0 in our favor with protocols that don't plan on selling out for profit.
What if I Set up a node with an independent protocol who has followed regulation and keep it up and all of us do the same....
Then WE- are web 3.
Its only centralized if we ALL do not stay true and totally redesign!--usually for profit.
Should we judge the chess board before we play?
Believing decentralization promises are gone again then, Jojo?
Dont believe scared billionaire news. They want you banking on CBDCs --and they cant get that until all of the threats (programmers contributing to HN) are full of disillussionment and quit dissenting and creating well designed decentralized blockchains.
Get away from sold out Bitcoin and ETH and coinbase and the like.
Node up with projects that are Designed for and Maintain Decentralizarion. My fav is Polkadot.
Doing Our part by never working for or supporting sold out protocols is centralizations' threat.
When CBDCs come around its free coins and those are going to be like zombie manna. Dont eat zombie manna.
So node up. We still write the rules!
Until its MUSK Web3, its still open game for us to make it-- ours.
What are you here for anyway?
Node up. Just pick an independent project thats adhereing to regulations.
Below is proof of my argument.
(view all for full effect)
"Whether a blockchain is centralized or decentralized
simply refers to the rights of participants on the ledger, and
is therefore a question of design."
