Python and Javascript (in the browser) due to their single threaded nature. C++ too as long as you have a std::atomic on the left hand side (since they overload the operator).
I think cooling in a chip vs cooling in space are two orthogonal problems. In a chip, the problem is getting the heat to the heatsink where it can be efficiently dissipated into the much larger heatsink of the surrounding environment. In space, the problem is that the only way to dissipate heat is thermal radiation because you're in a vacuum.
And why shouldn't they? I would expect the components of GDP to correlate with living standards even if GDP does not measure it as accurately as possible.
It's harder then it first seems. The root problem is that for text like "hallo", correcting to "hello" may be fixing an error or introducing an error. In general, the more aggressive your error correction, the more errors you inadvertently introduce. You can try and make a judgement based on context ("hallo, how are you?"), which certainly helps, but it's only a mitigation. Light error correction is common and effective, but you can't push it to a full solution. The only way to fully solve this problem is to look at the entire document at once so you have maximum context available, and this is what non-traditional OCR attempts to do.
Okay, but there way more common errors that should be easy to fix. "He11o", "Emest Herningway", incorrect diacritics like the other person mentioned, etc.
AGI is when a computer can accomplish every cognitive task a typical human can. Given tools to speak, hear, and manipulate a computer, an AGI could be dropped in as a remote employee and be successful.
You're talking about the mostly peaceful protesters who tried to burn down the Federal building in Portland for over 200 nights, right? Sedition and insurrection.
> tried to burn down the Federal building in Portland for over 200 nights
If you're pissing your pants in fear of people who fail to do something 200 nights in a row, I'd argue that says a lot more about you than it does them.
Can I say Singletons are not recommended but also agree that there are contexts where it's an "okay enough" option? Singetons are never the "best option" in modern software, but it's not the "worst" in every case either.
Now, filling your code base with incorrect calculations: pretty much always a bad idea.
BTC means they can pull wealth out of the system at astonishing rates. Trump & Co are hardly the first to be corrupt, but the scale, the blatentness, and the damage being done to the country as a byproduct is unprecedented in modern history
Claude (possible all LLMs, but I mostly use Claude) LOVES this pattern for some reason. "If <thing> fails/does not exist I'll just silently return a placeholder, that way things break silently and you'll tear your hair out debugging it later!" Thanks Claude
reply