Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cjbgkagh's commentslogin

Obviously it depends on what you’re doing and what is importante to you. It’s hard to beat Bambi Labs H2D or X2D for versatility, practicality, and price. Engineering filaments are getting a lot cheaper as the market expands so it helps to have a printer than can handle those. Given Bambi Labs is so cheap compared to the alternatives customers would probably be better off putting aside the savings to buy a second printer from a different supplier when one starts to catch up.

As I mentioned in a sibling comment, I bought a qidi q2 because i am gambling that they have caught up in terms of quality. The price is comparable to the bambu p1s, while the specs are closer to the x1c. Reviews seem to put it roughly on par with the p2s, which costs 30% more.

It’s clear nobody’s caught up in terms of ux / user friendliness - but as an experienced printer i don’t need my hand held quite as much - and the openness is worth a lot to me. Being able to define custom klipper macros alone makes it worth it to me to stay away from bambu


I think there is an element of audience capture. Similar to how ElectroBOOM has to keep electrocuting himself for his audience. It’s a living…

Maybe you know this, but ElectroBOOM doesn't actually electrocute himself, it's just a running gag.

The few I’ve seen were obviously staged but it did appear real in that he was hit with a high voltage. Looking it up suggests that he has been injured a number of times due to miscalculations.

it's a stupid running gag because some might watch that and think playing with 120V live wire is fine.

It sure seems real to me. although some of those HV circuits like the jacob's ladder seem way too dangerous.

As a matter of fact he has mentioned that one of the Jacob's Ladder videos was the only time he messed up and came close to actually electrocuting himself (by reflexively trying to grab the leads as they fell off a table). Otherwise all of the shocks are "calculated" to be nonharmful.

In the late 90s internet there was a blogger that built cool stuff with electricity, really seemed to know what he was doing, one day he blogged about how he was going to use a bunch of microwave transformers for an upcoming project. No updates since then, I presumed he died by accident.

He showed in one of his videos that he uses some explosive material for the spark and explosion, but it's been years so I don't exactly remember.

It seems to be more of a US phenomenon and it is pretty pervasive in the US.

I don’t know what is humane about skid row et al.

Direct torture is certainly less humane than abandonment.

Skid row isn’t abandonment, CA spends $47K per homeless person per year in direct and indirect assistance. It exists as it does due to intentional and well funded policy.

Even granting that (which... no. How is it true? Any evidence?) it's still less inhumane than what Japan is doing here. The conditions amount to torture.

The fact that many people opt to falsely plead guilty and get a reduced punishment in a society that highly values honor and saving face should say a lot about it.


Californian spend on homelessness is public info, you’re free to search it yourself.

There is something about seeing drug addicted zombies impossibly contorted in on themselves and swaying in the wind that appears very inhuman to me. If given the choice, pre zombification, of a false confession or life as a zombie I know which I would chose.


That's a false binary. European nations manage without either of them for example.

I think it is that the US is merely ahead of Europe and Europe will catch up to the US in this regard. Just give it 20 to 30 years.

Why do you believe mantaining an acceptable level of peacefulness requires torture?

I don’t accept your premise that the Japanese system is torture.

Extreme control of movement and sleep including deprivation of it for arbitrary amounts, constant lighting, no outside time, nothing to do for months at a time, lack of nutritious food, all those things in combination constitue torture under most modern definitions.

I think the opening scene makes the hereditary position very clear, I don’t know how anyone could interpret that as not marking the case of ‘nature’ determining intelligence.

Edit; sorry, either I misread your comment or it was changed. On the premise that ignoring the intro a nurture based idiocracy could be possible, I would suggest it’s the thoroughness and extent of dumbing down that wouldn’t be possible if it was based on nurture.


smart people are born into dumb families pretty regularly

Are you implying widespread infidelity here, or are you making the case that something besides "nature" may be determining intelligence?


I did edit that out before your comment because I didn’t feel I needed it, but I still stand by it.

There is still quite a lot of randomness in genes, the idea that intelligence would always be the average of the parents would require that that a very large number of SNPs are involved. GWAS studies do say this but this is more a side effect of using linear regression for the scores as this assumes independence which I think is not a safe assumption. I think some intelligence genes can be recessive so you can have two carrier parents where 1/4 of their children will be smarter than either of them.

I should also add, by pretty regularly I mean from the point of view from the smart people. Given a sample of smart people how often are they notably smarter than both parents.


Is it hereditary when parent is a dumb jock who creates a ridiculously bad environment in terms of 'nurture' aspect? I am not sure you thought your argument fully through.

Yes, and science explicitly allows him to continue procreating where otherwise he would have not been able to (he was in an accident because he was stupid). It’s explicitly saying the darwinian winnowing of the weaker (dumber) members of the species has been interfered with.

Fair point. I re-read your argument and I accept it.

As others are mentioning LLMs are actually rather helpful in making new programming languages and then programming in those languages.

For me, a DIY programming language is something I wouldn’t have the time for without the help of AI.


Anyone who complained was disappeared so no-one is complaining anymore.

China took over Honk Kong and lots of people complained about that before it happened but afterwards not so much.


Americans consistently vote for less war and they consistently get more war. If they voted for more war I’m pretty sure they would still get more war. I think blaming the American public for these wars is a deflection from the actual mechanisms that instigate them. We are more governed by blackmail than we are by voters.

I do wish there was even more resistance though, war has been effectively pitched as costless or even as a boon. Perhaps if this war bites there will be more resistance to future wars. At the very least the Iran war being such a disaster may have saved us from a more costly war with China - which the US was and in some ways still is gearing up for.


> I think blaming the American public for these wars is a deflection

Where did I do that? There's no one to vote for that doesn't wage war.

But to say voting for Trump was voting for less war is plain ridiculous. You'd have to ignore his entire career. He is famously fickle, is not shy about lying, and abandons friends at the soonest opportunity. A rational person hearing him say "I will end the Ukraine war on day 1" would understand he's saying whatever he thinks sounds good.


I consider the marginal voter to be rather dim, credulous, and uninformed irrational actors.

Politics in a universal suffrage democracy is the art of idiot whispering and Trump is a master of this art. I do believe that most of his voters genuinely thought they were voting for less war.


As a side effect of bailing out banks they have a lower risk profile than entities that don’t get bailouts. It’s essentially an additional subsidy on top of the already generous ‘money creation’ they’re allowed to do. It’s impossible to compete against this. The riskier the bets the stronger the subsidy so of course they’ll crank risk up to 11. Since the fate of banks and pensions are tied you can’t punish the banks without also punishing pensioners and pensioners are a strong voting block. It’s a distorted economic system that can only either crash or become more distorted. Since becoming more distorted enriches the already wealthy then that’s the only option that will be taken. The only thing that can stop it is to run out of resources to spend trying to save it. Importing a large number of foreigners is a rather creative (desperate) solution. I don’t know how long this will last but I’m confident I will see a major economic calamity in my lifetime.

I have this problem with NixOS as one of my build servers doesn’t have enough ram. There doesn’t seem to be a way to know if a compilation is likely to be ram heavy and either use a tagged server with more ram or use few threads on servers with less ram.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: