Red panda not fox

This is not true for any of the nuclear waste generated in the US. Your talking about a fantasy world, not the current state.

A relative had this or a similar test come back positive. This sounds like a helpful signal on paper, but in reality it's not always actionable.

They assumed their previous cancer had survived and metastasized. Doctors couldn't find the source. It turned into a waiting game, where they lived with a sword of Damocles over their head. They were retested every few months and monitored. Then after a year the tests the levels dropped off. And the end result was nothing came of it so far.

It's normal to have some amount of pre-cancerous cells get naturally removed by your immune system. And this catches those too.

All dolphins are whales. Not all whales are dolphins. It's a square / rectangle situation.

Orcas are indeed dolphins, and also whales.

The AI should be forced to use the same rules as the human. Not the other way around. The AI shouldn't be using outside resources.

Another rule bans "using third-party software or scripts in order to gain an unfair advantage over other players."

So is it even possible for O3 to beat another player while complying with the rules?

If a player uses such a model, the model is third-party and the player is cheating.

But: when a specific model is itself under test, I would say that during the test it becomes "first" (or second?) party rather than "third".

I think third-party here means not produced by GeoGuesser rather than not produced by the player.

I think that's part of the point they're making, hence "They should've simply redone the test."

This is the best you can come up with? Supporting women's rights is propaganda?

Propaganda doesn't mean something you have to disagree with or that is somehow wrong. Rights are a political and ideological component of a society, and trying to persuade other countries to adopt those social positions is most certainly propaganda.

Whatever you want to define it as, it is not science in any way, shape, or fashion. And funding intended to further science could certainly be far more well spent.

> This is the best you can come up with? Supporting women's rights is propaganda?

Is it hard science?

Sadly the other power here is turbotax/intuit :(

I was going to say, Intuit could simply have given/owe Musk a solid favor for this.

I'm surprised both the blog post and all the other comments don't mention how it should have logic to check if the item exists in the path before adding it. Otherwise you get duplicates added everytime you source your config.

Your function does that so +1. Though I'd use

    [[ $PATH =~ "(^|:)$newelement($|:)" ]] 

over grep -q but it functions the same.

Another option is to set the full $PATH value explicitly instead of doing an add thing for each directory. This avoids duplicates and the extra logic, but maybe isn't as convenient.

Yes teens are forced to use social media or miss out on interacting with and making friends.

The longitudinal facebook/Instagram study that came out a few years ago found that those who abstained felt ostracized.

You sound like a boomer who says kids don't need a phone and should just go knock on another kids door to make friends.

That's not true. The actual number for that question that said they would trust most/always is 23%.

You're just assuming there were only two options for that question and making up a number.