Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | carl_corder's comments login

This video really helped me to digest the concept. Thanks for sharing!


This reminds me of a passage from "Einstein's Dreams" by Alan Lightman. It's the difference between mechanical time & body time. You can read it here: http://members.iif.hu/visontay/ponticulus/britannicus/einste... (the 24 April 1905 entry).


Of course it floats. But that's not what I was trying to say. Go to your cup, put some ice in it and then mark the water level. Now let the ice melt and remark the water level. They will be at the same level.


What happens when you add an ice-cube? That's what happens when ice slides off of continents.

A break-up this huge may not directly alter sea-levels but it's certainly symptomatic of a larger disruption that's playing out on a massive scale.


I agree with Firebrand (^above) that if the ice is already floating (sea ice) and it melts it will cause no other immediate displacement of volume (even if a large part of that floating ice is above sea level and even if solid water takes up less space than liquid water). That's an application of Archimedes principle and can be explained here: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/110645/why-does-i.... Indeed it's land ice melting that causes sea level rise. However, sea ice melting still changes the albedo and does directly contribute to climate change.


True, I was thinking that its not truly free floating sea ice and that much of it may be supported by the remaining ice its attached to (hence the crack).


I wanted to try playing the game (EtherSpace), so I added the MetaMask extension to Chrome. I noticed the account is initiliazed with 1.000 ETH on the Ropsten Test Network. However, the game requires you to play on the Main Ethereum Network for a price of 0.01467 ETH. Sadly, I have no ETH on this network.


This is my take away:

PolarPlot[(Abs[Cos[2(t - Pi/2)/4]] + Abs[Sin[44(t - Pi/2)/4]])^(-1/(-0.2)), {t, 0, 2*Pi}, PlotRange -> {{-20, 20}, {-5, 32}}, PlotStyle -> Darker[Green, 0.2], PlotTheme -> "Marketing"]


I understand how these call would cost Instagram/Google/Microsoft money. But, could someone please explain why a call to a premium number "earns" the account holder money?


So you can obtain a premium number, and then when anyone calls you on that number they get charged the rate that you set per minute and after fees, you get the money. That's how pay per minute phone services (esp. adult services) work.

So what he did was to get one of those numbers and then have Google / Facebook / Instagram call that number repeatedly and that's how he would get money.


But the phone company requires ID and bank info to obtain a premium number. And then when you do this, google calls them to complain, and phone company terminates your account, keeps the money, and reports you to the police for fraud. Doesn't seem like a very good exploit.


This isn't true. You can get such numbers all over the world; some you can sign up for online and provide reasonably anonymity. You can make a lot money doing scammy-stuff and the risk of being prosecuted is pretty low. It's just not worth trying to go after some guy with an account with a telecom in Elbonia.

The cases of telecom fraud that I know of that were caught are usually due to incredible arrogance on the perpetrator's fault. In one case, he actually called the company he was attacking to gloat that they could never get him. (The company used a super-vulnerable-yet-expensive switch that literally had bugs like "&admin=1 gets superuser".) I've not seen a VoIP system that was remotely secure.


You would be the one behind the premium number.


The account holder is the operator of the premium number. When they set up the premium number, they receive a large portion of the fees of any calls to that number.


Another interesting and related topic are Ramsey numbers. R(3,3)=6 which means:

"In any party of six people either at least three of them are (pairwise) mutual strangers or at least three of them are (pairwise) mutual acquaintances"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theorem_on_friends_and_strange...


This sounds like a tautology. What am I missing?


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: