Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | card_zero's commentslogin

No one is less tolerant of attacks than the dead.

Well, if you think of person as a bunch of ideas, maybe with a mind attached, then by attacking a dead person you're attacking a bunch of vulnerable ideas that no longer have a mind to defend them. You can still call it a person, if you like.

>You can still call it a person, if you like.

No thanks, because a person is not a group of ideas + a mind.


I suppose you shouldn't jeer at them for being dead, for a start, and you should make allowances for their being dead when judging their actions. Treat them fairly.

They weren't dead yet when they did the actions for which they are judged, right?

Actions, inactions, same difference.

You mean to say (emotively) that humans drive that way all the time?

No, I'm saying (factually) that demanding perfection from self-driving cars costs lives.

Regime change might not be beneficial to the US, it might be too much trouble.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cj691w2e840t?post=asset%3A8b0d...

"... there will be plenty of voices around Trump advising him to be careful if he does go down that route. The Trump administration would be careful, because the consequences of regime change would be extremely complex ..."


Trump is going to be careful all of a sudden? That's not his MO, whether you think that's good or bad.

True. He's been talking about "negotiations", though.

Sensuality is crucial to intelligence maybe?

That would be an interesting point, if it was.

I bet you also sometimes like to make music because the final result emerges from your intimate involvement with striking keys, no? That's the suggestion.

This is ridiculous. You're genuinely applying social pressure to close tags. I remember when this began, drove me nuts.

An anonymous account on HN is applying social pressure?

Or am I pointing out that closing tags is a human social issue, with aspects ranging from practical & reasonable, to ridiculous & widely exploited?


Monopolies are unstable (too). They just last for an annoyingly long time.

I mean, not really? They don't decay naturally, all the ones I can think of had to be manually dismantled through State interventions.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: