Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | c0vfefe's commentslogin


They might as well call the site "PleaseHackMe."


And considering carcinogens specifically, they're so ubiquitous in modern life in various tiny quantities that eliminating credible risks becomes an exhausting goose chase.


There's a lot to appreciate about Stallman, but as an ideologue, he's never going to prioritize a gentle & incremental articulation of his ideas. We could call it a failure to empathize, but you see ideologues all over undermining their communication by making it as distilled & radical as possible. But that's not what tends to convince other humans they're wrong about something.


That makes it hard to come out of your office to accomplish a specific task, like grabbing coffee or visiting the restroom. Then your attention's not free game, and you still have to sneak around.


It's basically a warning against escapist entertainment of any form.


You're getting downvoted, but I just want to let you know that you're absolutely right. It's a very adolescent thing to reduce life-meaning down to career, and project one's angst onto everybody else. I'm all for finding a way to enjoy the 1/3 of life that is your career, but the "wake up sheeple" alarmism is not higher vision, it's a failure to see both the restrictions of a scarce economy and the joys of family and responsibility.


Why do you hate it?


It's slow.

It's broken in weird ways (renaming or moving a file will break it basically)

The threaded chats confuse everyone.

It's poorly integrated with the rest of office (I can't seen to figure out how to 'share to teams' from Word or Excel for example.

Plusses: The group video chat works well. It's not Skype for Business.


Anecdotally, I'd say yes, it's mostly the discoverability, plus things like Prime shipping, reviews, the generally good UI, etc.


How much profit does Amazon show?


Amazon made $2.62 billion in the last quarter, and $3.5 billion the quarter before that.

Amazon makes a ton of money, and (quite transparently I might add) they plow a lot of their earnings from some of their businesses into investing into their other businesses, which is what most investors want.

This is completely different from Uber and Lyft, where it's not clear that their profit potential supports their current valuations.


Amazon has demonstrated its ability to show a profit. Uber and Lyft have not.


If the acronym is only about profit then it is both misused and excludes other obvious companies like Microsoft.


It’s not entirely about profit, but I would argue you have to show a profit, or, demonstrate you could show a profit like Amazon has, to be considered a “top company” in any sense.


How does it exclude Microsoft, who reported $8.4 billion net income for Q2 2019?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: