Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more broken_clock's comments login

There's a reason they changed Google's internal chat system to delete all messages after max 30 days. They don't want discovery happening again.


Godot currently doesn't even have good support for things like in-app purchases for iOS/Android. No one is willing to work on stuff like that for free/open-source fun.

I think the big moat is that for studios, games are so risky to make, that there's no reason to take on tech risk by possibly running into issues like this. You know Unity will work for basically any non AAA game you want to make.

Hopefully this $15m closes that gap.



The iOS one is unmaintained and has been for a while (it still doesn't officially support Godot 4.x). Supposedly it should be maintained again by EOY but we've yet to see any progress on it.


Maintaining this yourself is trivial. We sell IAPS on Android, iOS, Steam & XSolla in the Godot game engine. Android and iOS are the easiest. This is really, really minor stuff we're talking about here.


Maybe you can write a blog post or a reddit thread?

There were a bunch of people asking about it on Discord for Godot 4, and some confused reddit threads offering to pay people for a tutorial:

https://www.reddit.com/r/godot/comments/11vxeo7/can_i_please...

https://old.reddit.com/r/godot/comments/13ka6qc/will_pay_to_...


You can't be serious?


Those are just frontends on top of Stable Diffusion. They won't provide what you need for a game - the results aren't animatable or rigable.


Just going to comment this exact thing. You can achieve the same as any of these glorified SD wrappers with custom loras from civitai and controlnet, but animation which is crucial to any 2d based game (outside of a few genres like puzzle / card games) is non-existent.


Biggest question: How much of OpenAI's IP do they get to access at Microsoft? (and perhaps take with them to whatever new startup they would obviously found after?)


How many autonomous miles has comma driven?


From the first article from 4 years ago:

>Last month, we had 1,209 cars drive a little over 1,000,000 miles

Let's say they've had zero growth since then, so 48,000,000 conservatively?

Actually, from their website [1]:

>100+ million miles driven and 10k users.

[1]: https://comma.ai


That's a parody account


In journalist speak, that means "credible person I know who would get fired if I said their name."

It's probably literally an exec on the OpenAI/Microsoft partnership.

The alternative to "a person familiar" is us as readers never get this information at all.


I think a lot of people don't understand how anonymous sourcing works in jounalism.


It's hard. I'm instinctively inclined to believe this story, but from first principles, why should I trust that Axios has adequately vetted this source? All I know about them is that lots of people in my circles send me their articles, I've never seen or conducted a review of their journalistic practices.

Obviously thinking about it this way would cause me to miss or disbelieve a lot of true stories, but it doesn't seem right to say I should trust every outlet I see widely posted either.


I know what it means and I agree it's probably an exec. The issue is that the premise - "Microsoft Corporation didn't know thing X at point in time Y" - is essentially unverifiable gossip, yet is presented here as fact


Believe it or don't, newspapers report on things which cannot be immediately verified all the time. Get over it.


> In journalist speak, that means "credible person I know who would get fired if I said their name."

those are some bold beliefs given the overall honesty in journalism and benefits to being first to publish.


There's a lot to criticize about Axios, but having high-profile connections is like the entire reason they exist. They don't make stuff up.


Why didn't other oil companies have a go at building something better than Standard Oil?


Actually they did. Standard Oil was already on the way out at the time of its anti-trust action and subsequent breakup. It's well documented.


Both Bengio and Hinton have their names plastered over many of the seminal works in deep learning.

AlexNet, the paper that arguable started it all, came out of Hinton's lab.

https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2012/hash/c399862d3...

I really don't think they need to build any more of a brand.


> I really don't think they need to build any more of a brand.

Brand-building is an ongoing process. You'll notice even the most recognized brands on earth, like Apple and Coca-Cola, are still working on building their brand.


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: