so no expot. growth? who would have guess?

/s

everyone dont worry, if they go down in few years, they crash other stocks with them (truth will be out?) so in the end money printer will be activated and you will be paying for it. This is not even a prediction but it's just some possiblity. Still nobody knows the future ofc

on the opposite site, you know what they say, "there is no algo. for truth"

it's insane that Norway state literally have the greatest wealth fund per capita, and state still wants more? wtf.

It's not like extra tax from wealthy is needed to support poor, so they pay their share? They are not some avg. country that needs extra tax to balance budget. State in Norway is already incredibly rich, beyond Usa and almost any nation on earth. Truth here is they do not want local competition and they hate wealth creation for indivuals? they have $trillions under control of the state and they punish wealthy and take extra millions? they already have that but greed level in people and state is beyond anyone and any entity. No company/other person is as greedy as them

between w10 and w11 they even changed some parts off how bat scripts works too, just basic scripts that work in w10 explorer dont work in w11. I had few issues. Total mess and bad product

social welfare in almost any nation (excl. energy rich countries) is not sustaniable long term. maybe we can start with ack. that fact? Sure retired people can get some amounts and free food but bigger amounts in budget just don't make sense? I mean calculate and see it. Countries literally pay these with DEBT. How hard it is for avg people to get this? It is such a simple thing to calculate too. When debt gets too big for so many countries, entire thing collapses? we know that already

This has been a refrain of the political right for several decades now, particularly in the US, and appears to be ideological rather than factual.

I dont support right, just search for countries by gdp/debt %. It's been just incresing for decades, that is not sustanaible + welfare + any govern. service that relies on that debt.

More simple , it's not sustainable because new workers dont earn much, people live longer and % from the state budget just keeps growing.

Think of it as income growth getting slower and liabilities growing just bigger with more old people in terms of %. how can you or we fix that?

> just search for countries by gdp/debt %. It's been just incresing for decades, that is not sustanaible

This is an idealogical argument more than a factual one. It certainly appears to be sustainable.

Step back from the gdp/debt ratio figures though. The argument is really only about whether a decreasing workforce can support an increasing population of retirees.

If government pays retirees then retirees get a direct payout, and use it to buy goods and services that younger people provide.

If (like in Australia) we make everyone invest through their life then each has a well-funded retirement account largely tied up in the stock-market. This represents part ownership of assets in the productive economy, which can be converted to funds that retired people will use ... to buy goods and services that younger people provide.

Where the money comes from seems less important to me than the fact if there is an ever increasing population of retirees, then one way or another they are supported by working people.

The mechanism is just an abstraction. The demographic problem is probably more real.

it went Nokia way and Nokia city is not far from there.

or you go "online" and milk customers for decade? yeah that is done by Rockstar.

Investors traded on stock markets even back when currency was backed by precious metals.

yes but nowhere near current % number of the popl. ? now a lot more people invest on it, big difference