I don't recommend Goretex, or other jackets with membranes, for outdoor activities (unless it's raining or it's really windy). They are not nearly as breathable as regular clothes, which means you will be sweating more. And even when you wear wool or a polyester fleece they won't warm as well as when they are dry.
This sound counter-intuitive but a lighter non-membrane jacket works better for me, both in terms of comfort and longer-term retention of body heat (better breathability -> less sweat -> smaller cooling effect).
I lived for over a decade in a place that was often quite cold in the winter. Like below 0°C for months, and sometimes down to -40°C for weeks. Also quite windy, so wind chill could be -50°C or below, at times.
And I didn't own a car, so bicycling was my only option. I did buy Gortex pants and jacket, though. So for riding, I wore silk underwear and sock liners, wool socks, heavy wool pants, high-top lace-up leather combat boots, a wool sweater, a neoprene face mask, and Gortex.
I wore pretty much the same kit for cross-country skiing and snowshoeing. But less for downhill skiing.
I did ski with a guy who almost froze to death, after his cotton and down got soaked.
I'm not against wool/polyester inner layers, they are much better than cotton. But it's not magic, they will also work worse when they are wet, and they don't transport the sweat from the skin perfectly. So what works the best for me is reducing the effect of accumulating sweat, i.e. maximizing the breathability of the jacket (for example, by using a "windshirt" style jackets from materials like Pertex).
Maybe in such exteme conditions as -40°C it's different, but for me a windshirt + thick inner layers (polyester/wool) work well for 6+ hour long bicycle rides in about 0°C.
And I should have mentioned that I'd unzip the Gortex when I got warmed up. Or even put it in my pack, and just use a windshirt. But it's nice to have, in case the temperature drops or the wind picks up. Or if there's freezing rain.
Thanks for the feedback. Yeah we are struggling to bring a simple description (you might look at the product faq [0]). But it's for a reason - Monique.io doesn't directly compete with similar products like traditional monitoring systems or dashboard frameworks.
If you are a programmer, then probably the most honest description would be that it's a monitoring system for "custom metrics" - anything that a traditional monitoring system or an APM platform can't collect (because it requires application-level knowledge like the data model in your DB). The traditional monitoring systems are focused on system-level metrics (CPU, memory) or performance data, making things like monitoring SQL results or JSON really hard and unnatural. Monique.io makes such tasks much simpler and "natural".
Another view is that the common knowledge about what is "monitoring" cuts out a large portion of things that really should be monitored (SQL results, health checks, API responses). The reason is that we can't collect the metrics automatically. But the work should be done and the traditional products don't provide much help for the task.
(saying all that, we and others use Monique.io also for monitoring CPU/disks, creating "BI" dashboards or sending messages to Slack)
Monique.io is a monitoring system focused on high-level "metrics" (SQL results, API responses, JSON data) that are automatically parsed by AI, with alarms defined in Javascript, plus the feature to auto-create a dashboard by employing the concept of a "template tile".
We created Monique.io because we were tired of the "same old, same old" monitoring systems that didn't help much with a lot of daily tasks.
We launched Monique.io a few months ago and now bring improvements and a free plan (which we are committed to preserve; the plan does not include alarming functionality).
Not sure how general this is, but in Poland if you have SaaS you need to have a company (because it's a "service"). But when you are selling just source code to someone else, it can be counted as personal income (no company needed).
I submitted my startup two days ago by myself, as someone who didn't have any PH "karma", but I somehow was granted permissions for submitting products (probably because I was subscribed to a newsletter for a long time). I asked by email if it's ok if I submit my startup by myself. I was told it's ok and wished good luck.
On the launch day my site received literally five visits (in the first hours, probably a few more later). It was dead from the start and didn't get a real chance to be seen by the community. Lesson for everyone: under no circumstances have your product submitted to PH by a non-mod account.
I'm actually not angry at PH. They have their rules which are obviously working. The "elitist" model is working (to some degree at least). My fault was that I didn't follow the guides which mention what I learned. And I think they should give a warning when submitting a product by an account like mine, because there's no practical chance such product will be visible.
Just to provide a counterpoint, I submitted a pretty simple Chrome extension 2 months ago and got 270 upvotes and around 2k visits to it's website. It ended up no. 6 for the day so almost made it in the daily newsletter. It was my first time submitting anything, was pretty much inactive before it and all the promotion I did at the time was tweeting to my 400 followers.
That must be the difference (or I was blocked by some filter). I didn't try to make a social-media call-for-action, because I didn't want to trigger voting-ring protections.
EDIT. As for the filters... PH doesn't allow comments which include "ps aux" or "curl" strings. I learned this by studying HTTP responses using Developer Tools, because the error was not signalled in PH's UI :).
It IS possible to get lucky on content aggregation sites without any magic. I've had this happen for me in several places – HN, Reddit, Medium. But it's very hit and miss. You can post something great and have it totally miss 9 out of 10 times. Most people aren't interested in sifting through the new stuff – they just want to engage with whatever's already popular. If even 5-10% of a community was committed to rigorously assessing new submissions, then quality would rise to the top – but most people tend to just upvote whatever is already on the up-and-up.
This "Mathew effect" is the case with a lot of things – book deals and record deals, for instance. Unknown artists occasionally do get their big breaks by being in the right place at the right time. But if you're managing one (even if it's yourself), it makes sense to improve your odds by being systematic, and yes, basically cosying up to the gatekeepers whoever they are.
I think PH is different because it seems that if a superuser/mod will not upvote an item, it will be practically dead. On HN/Reddit/Medium you will always get at least 20-50 views. On PH I got 5. It's even more stark when you count the fact that top PH submissions get many more views than on HN/Reddit/Medium.
> They have their rules which are obviously working.
Their comment section doesnt work. It feels like stumbling into North Korea or Stepford, Connecticut along with some Idol worship. I dont know if ive been anywhere moderated that strictly, with such low insight dense comments.
As a counter-example, someone posted our product on PH and we only noticed when we saw a spike in signups and had a look at where they were coming from. It ended up being #1 that day and still is the main source of signups.
I don't have a PH account myself though and never go to that website, it was pretty bad in terms of design/UX.
The same happened here. One of the mods found our product and put it on PH. We just had a signup button, but there was no activity that a signed in user could do. People still signed up. Who posts your product on PH matters, I think. If we had posted it ourself it would have looked pretty sad.
Do you mean an "enterprise" self-hosted plan with a price of >= $1k / mo?
Generally everything is possible, since we are now learning how the users would like to use the service. But the SaaS model is easier to manage, and there are successful monitoring services that use this model (www.stathat.com).
Is it? I didn't know it. I thought it was interesting because it didn't required installing anything, or even signing up for an account. I wasn't aware that traditionally monitoring systems worked by submitting JSON data.
I think you are right that the "really traditional" monitoring system like Nagios or Munin only work through agents and plugins. Some of the hosted systems have centralized APIs. But, to my knowledge, they all use the metric concept ((name, value) pairs) and it's why I called it "traditional".
Neat, I'm setting a reminder to check back. I'm not opposed to paying. I just have to calibrate it against other things I am used to paying for. Cheers
This sound counter-intuitive but a lighter non-membrane jacket works better for me, both in terms of comfort and longer-term retention of body heat (better breathability -> less sweat -> smaller cooling effect).