Just because it's a Buddhist practice, and it's ancient, that's all you need...?
The same can be said about any other religious practice.
You sound almost like a Christian preacher who could very well say,
"Well, the 20 centuries of Christianity, and all those priests and laypeople. I'm not sure if you consider all that they've said and written to be evidence, but I think you should."
You need reasons actually grounded in preferably personal practice.
That is, something treated like a scientific experiment performed on yourself, to see if following the steps affects you. Then, you look at the results others have attained.
And then you draw rational and logical conclusions based off of that cumulative data.
Hmm, no, sorry if that's how it seemed. I mean the tens of thousands of books, talks, testimonials, etc, that make specific claims like attaining freedom from suffering using various specific strategies and meditation practices.
> You need reasons actually grounded in preferably personal practice.
My personal practice is a few thousand hours of meditation. It's obvious to me that the practice is working, but I can't say exactly what it's doing to my brain, and I can't prove it to anyone else (unless I would already appear odd on a brain scan)
It's quite clear that during 2020, the case numbers flattened then declined once the lockdown restrictions reached a certain level. (I live in Melbourne so experienced it first hand).
Other Australian cities and NZ have been able to contain outbreaks with short lockdowns, and have been able to keep the countries Covid-free, more than any other countries. There is no other plausible explanation for the suppression of the virus that was achieved in 2020.
(For what it's worth, with emergence of the delta strain, suppression measures are not working so well, and the government policies are having to adjust, which is starting to happen now in Victoria).
This boils everything down to brains, and discards the human individual, and how different human individuals react differently to the same things depending on their pre-existing understandings of their worlds.
Can you expand more on your distinction between talking about brains being bad and talking about individuals being good? Are you saying all brains are the same, and something else makes us different?
Just because it's a Buddhist practice, and it's ancient, that's all you need...?
The same can be said about any other religious practice.
You sound almost like a Christian preacher who could very well say,
"Well, the 20 centuries of Christianity, and all those priests and laypeople. I'm not sure if you consider all that they've said and written to be evidence, but I think you should."
You need reasons actually grounded in preferably personal practice.
That is, something treated like a scientific experiment performed on yourself, to see if following the steps affects you. Then, you look at the results others have attained.
And then you draw rational and logical conclusions based off of that cumulative data.