Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | TheDom's commentslogin

Just the standard advice: It's usually much easier to switch into a new role (MLE, manager,...) at your existing company than landing those roles directly at a new company. So if your current employer does not employ any MLEs, consider joining another company that does– but apply for a role you're currently well qualified for, and then try to make the switch internally. Consider being up-front about that in the hiring process to get signal on how supportive a company is.


One of my favorite genres!

Any book by Steven Levy is great, he is the master! He wrote multiple books about Apple, and also about Google, Facebook,…

Hatching Twitter: A True Story of Money, Power, Friendship, and Betrayal by Nick Bilton

Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup by John Carreyrou

Console Wars: Sega, Nintendo, and the Battle that Defined a Generation by Blake J. Harris

The Founders: The Story of Paypal and the Entrepreneurs Who Shaped Silicon Valley by Jimmy Soni

That Will Never Work: The Birth of Netflix and the Amazing Life of an Idea by Marc Randolph (Netflix Cofounder)

I'm Feeling Lucky: The Confessions of Google Employee Number 59 by Douglas Edwards


Does "Console Wars" mostly exam from the business perspective, or does it go through the technical decisions as well? Would love to read why the engineers adopt this or that architecture, and why this many RAM/ROMs, etc.


It only talks about the business perspective, sorry!


Thanks, I wish there is one talking about the technical details, but not as technical as the specification documents.


Their packaging is also careless! They have ruined so many books I ordered, and I am now buying most from other online stores instead (even though they are often more expensive).


It’s a great way to get free books.


Not necessarily, the market is very competitive here. But to get to $500k TC as an IC (<= L5), your company will have to do well to increase the value of your grants by ~50-100%. But that is not uncommon or unrealistic.


It's not a terrible deal, ISOs can be very advantageous from a tax perspective.


Absolutely, I like it a lot!

I am from Austria and moved here 2.5 years ago. In between I lived in Dublin, Ireland for 1.5 years (can't recommend unless you like rain).

The main reason I moved to SF and why I also see myself here for the foreseeable future is the job market. No other place in the world can match the density of exciting tech companies of the SF Bay Area.

I LOVE my job but if I would not, then there would be tons of other interesting companies I could work for. If you’re a good engineer, then you can basically choose which company to work for (assuming you’re good at the interviewing game). Recruiters reach out all the time, and over time you will also build up a network of friends at other companies.

All these exciting opportunities attract great talent from all over, and companies try hard to attract and retain that talent. It’s a lot of fun to work on a strong team!

The other thing that’s fairly unique to the Bay Area is the high total compensation for engineers. Based on what I hear and read, I would assume that the TC for a regular engineer with a few years of experience is at least $300k on average. AFAIK that’s impossible to find outside of the US, and only in a few other places inside the US (Seattle, NYC). Also, since the Bay Area is home to a lot of fast growing companies, the potential financial upside is huge if you're lucky enough to choose such a company!

The best advice I can give is to choose the company you work for carefully. Ensure the business has the right trajectory, the hiring bar is high, and the compensation is fair.

The city itself has been discussed here and elsewhere extensively. I agree with many of the points but overall I quite enjoy it. I live in a nice neighborhood (Inner Sunset) and for me the job market far outweighs the downsides of living here. At the moment I can not imagine moving back to Europe.

In the end, it depends on what you’re looking for and which set of trade offs is the right one for you.


A 6 year vesting schedule would be highly unusual. AFAIK it’s usually 2 (or maybe up to 4) years after an acquisition. Therefore I don’t think that this was a factor in his decision.


I don't have a citation here but I think facebook tried to create a slow vesting schedule for these aquihires so they would have golden shackles


Is this just your assumption? The WhatsApp acquisition was pretty famously on a 4 year vest [0], not sure why IG would have been different.

[0] https://www.businessinsider.com/whatsapp-founder-jan-koum-re...


It's also not uncommon for companies to drop that and have majority vest quicker to get rid of founders faster (provide a good encouraging deal) - especially if they dont play ball.


mmm I was pretty sure I read it. I cannot find the reference so I think you are right. I'm going to edit my comment.


Things are different at that high level. Not always “vesting” technically, but various retention bonus payout milestones.


The strategy is called dollar cost averaging: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_cost_averaging


Uber: https://twitter.com/alanzeino/status/1101167947874103296

I also talked to someone from Fb recently, and he said that even some internal teams have moved away from it.


At WWDC 2017 I was in the keynote speech line with two of the Facebook client team devs. According to them the entire client team was trying to get rid of RN, so maybe they succeeded.


I am from Austria, and just want to say that this assessment matches my own experience. Sadly I don't have an explanation for it either. I moved away 4 years ago but that's one of the many cultural reasons why I don't miss Austria much.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: