Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more Spoom's commentslogin

Redis had (may still have?) a billboard on the 101 saying something along the lines of, "my boss really wants to you know we're an AI company", which I thought was pretty funny. Hope this bubble pops soon and we can go back to making products that solve problems for people.


Stating my bias up front, I've been using Linux since Windows Vista, and I'm a fan. That said, I have experienced the same things you did whenever I needed to run Wine for... well, anything. It was clunky as hell.

You should absolutely revisit. Proton has changed the game. Literally the only game I've tried that was remotely difficult to play in SteamOS is Minecraft, likely because Microsoft owns it now. But I was able to get that working too (if anyone's wondering: you want Minecraft Bedrock Launcher, which is in the Discover store if you're on the Steam Deck and here[1] if you're somewhere else; basically it downloads and runs the Android version of Minecraft through a small translation layer, which is essentially identical to the Windows version).

Speed also is greatly improved from previous solutions. Games played through Proton are often very close in terms of performance to playing them natively.



chrome://flags/#prompt-api-for-gemini-nano to enable this on current Chrome (at least on Linux). It worked after I enabled that flag and restarted Chrome, though it required two tries (apparently it needed to download a model).

I tried to figure out if this stuff was available in other browsers but unfortunately came up short.

Googler, opinions my own.


The Prompt API [0] works in Edge, though it uses the Phi-4-mini model instead of Gemini Nano. [1]

Currently it doesn't work in Brave (at least on my machine), and I can't find anything online suggesting whether they plan on supporting the Prompt API. You can go to brave://flags/ and it shows "Prompt API for Gemini Nano" and "Prompt API for Gemini Nano with Multimodal Input", but it doesn't seem to actually work.

0. https://chromestatus.com/feature/5134603979063296

1. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/web-platfor...


"Now, if it fails, then you have to stop, and it's -- again, this is not something that just happens all of a sudden. It doesn't just implode. It screams like a mother before it implodes."

- Man crushed by an instantly imploding submersible


To be fair, it did scream before it imploded.

They just disregarded the screams because they couldn't afford to make sure it was still working.


Management classes will write textbooks about Stockton Rush, but not in the way he would have hoped


Right next to the O-rings will survive in temperatures colder than they were designed. At least Rush's backside cashed the check his mouth wrote where as the NASA engineers were still around after their decision. Does that make one better/worse than the other? Rush took other people with him though when he cashed that check.


For the record, NASA engineers recommended against launching, but were overridden by, as usual, management.


And again when Boeing's management overridden engineers in decision that Max 8 was safe to fly and new flight stabulity electronics were good enough.


For the record, Rush was management as well


Why? There’s already a plentiful list of disastrously wrong arrogant cocksure assholes. Still doesn’t stop people from thinking they’re the Steve Jobs flavor of arrogant cocksure asshole.


Steve Jobs, who very famously died of pancreatic cancer because he delayed surgical treatment in favor of fruit juice? That Steve Jobs?


the disastrously wrong arrogant cocksure assholes don't hear that part, they just hear "people told him he was wrong" and "millions of dollars"


Not quite the thing you're describing, but I saw this demoed recently and thought it was pretty cool: The AI function in Google Sheets[1]. Call Gemini with the context of individual cells and have it respond in the same cell. Take a look if your company is in Workspace Labs.

1. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/15820999

Disclaimer: Googler, opinions my own.


To be fair:

> Duration of Registration: Lifetime Registrant

Arguably the law says that you will never have paid your price.


With regards to the law, yes. I have to pay $100 every year and tell the government all my information.

Society is not the government. Society has the opportunity to let me back in.


Sure, and I'm not flagging your post or anything here. Society has the opportunity, but not the obligation.


Arguably Americans voted for all of that, though. It was laid out in a document that was public years in advance.


Well, there are varying opinions on that. I agree with you somewhat, but many that "voted for that" have said otherwise and either 1) didn't ever hear about said document or 2) actively dismissed it as "fake news" or 3) believed the president when he said he'd never heard of it and it wouldn't be his agenda.


Trump himself, and his spokespeople, all publicly denied that they had anything to do with Project 2025 ahead of the election. It was a laughable lie, the only people who believed it were apparently the media, who reported it as fact.


And the numpties who voted for him.


No, the government already has almost all of your information every year from the start. Every time you get a W-2, a copy is sent to the IRS. Same with the vast majority of most tax forms. That why, if you lose any of your forms (at least the ones that say something akin to "This information is being furnished to the Internal Revenue Service."), you can request them from the IRS[1].

Some investment-related returns aren't sent to the IRS but I would estimate that for 90% of people, their taxes could be accurately calculated by the information the IRS has on file.

Additionally, I guarantee that these calculations are being made by the government anyway. If you file a tax return that is mathematically incorrect, you are very likely to receive a correction letter from the IRS[2]. This isn't an audit, it's just a letter saying that your taxes were wrong and they redid them for you, with a new outcome.

1. https://www.irs.gov/individuals/transcript-types-for-individ... (see "Wage and income transcript")

2. https://www.irs.gov/individuals/understanding-your-cp12-noti...


Eh, I see the language "urges" in there regarding putting it into force. It would still need to pass Congress etc. and my guess is that such a provision would face massive domestic pushback.


I mean, "Apple refuses to hand over private data to government at cost of UK business" is a pretty good headline.


Give me that sort of commitment to privacy and translucent colorful cases for future Macs and Tim Apple's got my money for the next five years at least.


Give Apple a big enough incentive to negotiate with and they may very well cave. If I've learned anything about corporations, it's that money and incentives always speak louder than their purported values.


this isn't apple weighing ethics against revenue. this is apple being forced to decide how much their pro-privacy marketing is really getting them in the market.


Given that privacy is why my friends and I have iPhones, Apple will lose a lot of users and developers if they go back on privacy in any way.


Linux based smartphones will sell like crazy at that point.


Android are technically linux based.

I bought the Ubuntu phone. The phone was nice, but there were bareley any apps, and the maps app only worked online, which was useless outside of my home country. A dissapointment overall.


That’s the utopia that I want to live in lol but in reality, I think GrapheneOS will pick up more users.


Apple doesn't give their Chinese customers any privacy.


Yes, this would be something i would love to read


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: