Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RcouF1uZ4gsC's commentslogin

> Starting around 2015, paleogenomic studies revealed a dramatic genetic turnover across Europe around 3000 BCE. In many regions, 70-100% of male lineages were replaced within just a few centuries. The Yamnaya and their descendants didn't just rule; they moved in enormous numbers. The debate isn't fully settled, and both mechanisms likely operated in different places and times, but the DNA evidence has shifted the balance decisively toward mass migration as the primary driver in Europe.

They killed all the males and enslaved the women.


> They killed all the males and enslaved the women.

The first part of this is supported by an increasing number of archaeological finds. AFAIK the second part is not.


From what I know, there is no archaeological evidence for either but there is strong genetic evidence for both.

There is a lecture on yootoob but sorry I do not have the link. A Danish (IIRC) archeologist says they have been finding mass graves around northern europe that correlate to the hypothesis.

Also saying that words for things outside the home tend to PIE origins but things inside the home tend to non-PIE (i.e. pre-invasion) languages, supporting the idea that incoming males displaced & replaced existing males, taking the females.

Also saying that all in all, it mostly supports the theories originally proposed by the late Marija Gimbutas.


> In many regions, 70-100% of male lineages were replaced within just a few centuries. The Yamnaya and their descendants didn't just rule; they moved in enormous numbers.

If only the male lineages were replaced, it generally means that the yamnaya did not move in enormous numbers. Rather it means that male yamnayans and their male descendants ruled and use their privileged positions to outbreed the local males.

Mass migration would indicated a major shift in both the male and female lineages. Predominantly male lineage shift indicates rule. It's the difference between the US and mexico. In the US we had a complete genocide of the natives ( male and female lineages ) due to mass migration from europe. Mexico never experienced a mass migration from europe. Instead, the europeans took over the leadership of the aztecs/mexico and use their privileged position to outbreed the local males. It's why in mexico today most male lineages are european while almost all the female lineages are native. Whereas in the US, most of the male and female lineages are european while almost none of the male and female lineages are native.

> but the DNA evidence has shifted the balance decisively toward mass migration as the primary driver in Europe.

This is easy to verify. Do they follow the pattern of the US or Mexico? What are the female lineages in europe?


And then some person realizes that government ids can be faked, so they set up a system of doing a retinal scan of the person dropping off the car and then comparing it to the retinal scan of the person picking it up.

Then they realize that one person may be bribed so they require at least two people to verify at pickup and drop off.

Meanwhile, a car has never ever been stolen this way.


And when I need my wife to pickup my car for me because I took hers to work and she's taking an Uber to get my car...?

Definitely over the top issue.


Yup, it's taking me probably 10x longer gathering legitimate documents to send to these companies.

Meanwhile I could fake them all in a fairly short amount of time...


Open source and free software was the largest transfer of wealth in the form of techne freely from the craftspeople to the business people.

Knowing how to write a database could make one fabulously rich. Now the person who knows how to make and promote a simple crud app backed my MySql becomes the rich one, while the db people beg for donations.

Linux killed Sun/Solaris and SGI Irix

Developers have voluntarily moved further down in the chain of value - now just describing themselves as primarily a business liaison who can translate to code. All the computer whispering necessary to do all this is freely available and digestible for free.

LLMs are just the expected endpoint of this.


Well said. This also aptly describes the emergence of “script kiddies“ in the early 2000’s (now comically referred to as “engineers“). Promotion of simply combining libraries that are not understood by amateurish developers into mostly poorly implemented solutions thrust upon the end users. Corporations loved the lower salaries of web developers and the efficiency of utilizing open source libraries, thereby devaluing the skilled developers whose original intent was to share their knowledge via these oss libraries. Web development was the most affected by this trend initially, and as we see now is mostly impacted by the emergence of LLM‘s.

Beautiful. I like the displacement of human labor.

> He believes that the erosion of shared reality is a greater danger than putting AI in control of nuclear weapons.

Likely the hype of the doomsday clock contributes to that erosion.


Isn’t this how Russia always fights going back to the Czars?


And before, to the founding of the Russian identity, when confronted with the Khans and the europeans, they (the princes of Kiev) fought for generations, seasonal wars of attrition. And now they are fighting europe, pointing to the dinipter saying "remember?" Plus this war is much more, as it is the first high tech war, and many outside partys are involved in every way. Just think how SK is shitting square ones knowing that NK has troops fighting on the front lines, and is totaly involved in planning, tacticts and strategy.


> Just think how SK is shitting square ones knowing that NK has troops fighting on the front lines, and is totaly involved in planning, tacticts and strategy.

I think if SK was seriously worried about that, they would send troops to support Ukraine.


Human wave isn't a viable strategy for NK, so I'm not sure what they learned really. Maybe they learned how to parade and to die gracefully from the VDV?


I think that might be wishful thinking.

It is privileging 200 of history verses several thousand years of human history.


Several thousand years of human history in fact argues for their point of tendency towards equality being a natural imperative, and artificially enforced caste systems being unnatural and instinctively distasteful to people.

See Graber's last book before he died: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dawn_of_Everything?wprov=s...


Nothing says "instinctively distasteful caste systems" like the ongoing meat grinder in Gaza. Truly the pinnacle of humanity's natural drift toward equality.


The majority of people are horrified when they become aware of what's happening in Gaza. Personally I think a large majority of those that support it are sheltered from the reality of it, e.g. avoid seeing images of assassinated children.


Are you against income tax?

Are you against business registration?

All of these are subject to the similar issues with the stalker ex abusing a position of power?


> All of these are subject to the similar issues with the stalker ex abusing a position of power?

You seem to be asking a question. The answer is no.

The IRS does not need to know my sexual orientation or circumcision status. Medicaid, on the other hand, may. (Though I'd contest even that.)


Are you saying that, because there is one way in which people are vulnerable, that it doesn't matter if we add more ways they are vulnerable? Because that makes no sense whatsoever.


> People who love using AI to create software are loving it because they don’t value the act of creating & understanding the software.

This is very similar to the statement - People who love using Python (or other language not C or assembly) to create software are loving it because they don’t value the act of creating & understanding the software.


There is a category error here. Python and its standard library provide deterministic abstractions; they don't aim to solve the entire problem on your behalf.


C and Python are deterministic. LLMs are not. It’s not an apt comparison.


Interestingly the creative community benefited from stealing.

US Laws about photography in public places is much different than other countries where you have to get permission from people being photographed.

Creatives have used this to create their own art, based on the non-consensual photos of others.

A particularly egregious example is Arne Svenson, who used telephoto lenses to shoot into apartments and exhibited photos of children for his art

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/art...

And creatives were fine with that. They defended it as transformative, as a sacrifice we make for the betterment of society.

So pardon me, if I don't feel all that bad for creatives when the shoe is on the other foot.

AI is transformative, and brings creative capabilities to far more people.

Perhaps its their turn to sacrifice for the greater good of society.


Yes. See also Fleming’s James Bond. Dickens’ Nicholas Nickleby. *

This phenomenon is post-WWI and post-WWII and losing the greatest empire in history in a single generation trauma being retconned as if were the historical English perspective.

* Removed previously incorrect statement including Edgar Rice Burroughs who is an American although Tarzan is English


Edgar Rice Burroughs lived his entire life in the USA, right?


You are right. Updated the post


I'm not sure I understand the Burroughs example as relevant to the UK, but another good illustration is Thomas Hardy. His books sold well but were never seen as consistent with the UK cultural mainstream, and the reaction to Jude the Obscure in 1895 stopped him from writing novels entirely. Yet post-WWI he came to be seen/adopted as a mainstream cultural icon.


Good example of Hardy and the reception reflects the cultural change


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: