Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | JohnBerea's commentslogin

This could be used to create the Portal 2 Space personality core.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFgeustBpFk


On the subject of fictional AI characters, the single subject obsession reminds me of Taklie Toaster from Red Dwarf. Whatever you asked it, the answer would pertain to baked goods.


I've heard that Remedy has used[1] the D programming language in the past. Is it used on Alan Wake 2?

1. https://ubm-twvideo01.s3.amazonaws.com/o1/vault/gdceurope201...


Seems likely, they are apparently still using the same engine they developed for Quantum Break (Northlight)


The author of that left Remedy in 2017 so I wouldn’t be surprised if they replaced the D code by now. They have at Facebook while I was there.


Most certainly, yes.


Our scientists were so busy trying to figure out if they could, they never asked whether they should.


What is the music in that video? My Find Sound app is failing.


Love is Empty - Cindy Wang is what Shazaam on android is telling me.


How was Rome going to make money so that an investor could get a return on their investment?



I tried it out on Windows 10 but the mouse input is so laggy it's unusable. Looks like this bug has [already been reported](https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440744).


Yeah, I probably should have included a disclaimer that not everything works as well as it does on Linux. I mostly use the notification mirroring and file transfers, and those have both worked fine for me.


Why do I have to learn Yet Another Language to use this? Why can't it just use JavaScript or python for scripting?


I think you have to look at the time frame and history of when AutoIt and then AutoHotkey came out. What they were doing on the Windows OS was not so feasible with JavaScript. But AutoHotkey, and AutoIt to a lesser extent, have always used JavaScript in a supplemental way when possible.

As for Python (on the Windows OS) it doesn't come preinstalled, is far larger, less specific to automation, more confusing, and less convenient. There has been numerous Python attempts and projects to copy or make something similar to AutoHotkey and AutoIt, but they never caught on as much. AutoHotkey and AutoIt had already gained a reputation and became more firmly entrenched as the tools to use for automation tasks on Windows.


AutoHotkey has a huge support forum history in addition to great documentation. The language it uses seems terrible and confusing, almost as bad as bash! But if you want to do something chances are it has been done and there is example code already there to get your started, a lot like bash. That is worth a lot more than it having a better language at the end of the day.


JavaScript. To script Windows. Whoa. AHK is directly calling Windows' DLLs. We don't need another translation layer, and Python already has some libraries to accomplish similar tasks.


there's an ahk or ahkpy module to call it from Python.


I'm from the internet and I can assure you it has no basis in truth.


I love AutoHotKey but why do I have to learn a new language to use it? Why can't it use an established language like js or python?


Likely surface area and dependencies. Nothing is stopping you from using Python with some of the GUI automation packages. Sadly I'm not aware of any that are cross platform, then again neither is AHK or Auto it.


It's gone longer without a breaking change than Python, for one...


Let me start by saying that I appreciate the humour here :) However, in actuality...

Python is from 1991. Python 2 (from 2000) was not a breaking change if I'm skimming the "what's new in python 2.0" correctly. Python 2 was supported until 2020 (29 years).

Autohotkey from 2003 (19 years old now).

Unless AHKv1 is still maintained, Python wins by a decade.


Ahh, I was supposing if AHK had been written in Python, starting in 2003 because that's when AHK started, it would've experienced a breaking change in either 2008 or 2020, when Python 3 came out or when Python 2 ended support.

Either way, yes it was just a cheap attempt at a joke, thank you for seeing it as such! Python pedantry isn't my strong suit, obviously.


There is a nice python wrapper[1], perhaps that could work for your uses?

[1]: https://github.com/spyoungtech/ahk


Because AHK is about 20 years old. If it was created today it probably would.


Let's say this all works out and over the next few decades fusion replaces all other electricity generation, and we're past the point where all the initial infrastructure costs have been paid for.

How much will my electric bill be reduced?


If you live in California, even if electricity generation cost nothing at all it would still only lower your bill by ~15%. Transmission & distribution of electricity is the expensive part not generating it. It doesn’t need to be expensive, yet here we are.


Initial investment cost to build reactors would in all likelihood be very high just by the nature of these being some of the most complex machines on the planet. It seems unlikely any sort of fast manufacturing line could be created to build these, and they’d all likely be built one at a time like fission reactors.

Running costs and maintenance would also be high, the fuel alone is expensive (right now), and I’ve heard that wear and tear on parts of the reactors can be high so much of the housing for the reactor would need to be replaced with time.

You’ve probably also got a small army of engineers running each one of these reactors you’ve got to pay.

All that said, the energy produced via fusion is EXTREMELY abundant. I imagine with later reactor iterations (after supply chains have been setup and electrical transportation routes upgrades) electricity could become very cheap even relative to renewables.


This is kind of a silly question given the time horizons and other potential factors that can crop up in 30 years, but my electric bill has separate charges for generation and delivery. Even if generation drops by 90%, it'd still only cut my bill in half.


i doubt your electric bill would be reduced at all. It would probably increase at a more constant rate instead of dramatic ups and downs though. So there's that..


  > How much will my electric bill be reduced?
Your bill will be the same, or higher. But you'll be doing so much more with electricity. Push a button, and your clothes are clean in seconds. Push a button, and your beard is shaved in seconds. Push a button, and four of your five senses are entertained for hours.


Why cant you currently do those things then?


I'm unaware of a clothes washing machine currently on the market that finishes the job in seconds. I believe that the technology has yet to be introduced.


When it is, how many seconds-long washings will my cheaply-made shirts survive? My guess is nearly one.


I suppose that you don't remember when the microwave oven was introduced. Food warm in 60 seconds? Nuking it? It will destroy all the nutritional value, it was said. I remember people, including my family, excusing the fact that we owned a microwave oven with the phrase "hospitals use it".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: