I'd buy it

well said.

>It is unconstitutional and wrong, it also sets a precedent, how long before the FBI finds out someone politically unpopular is being "investigated" another nice thing is that once they take your money good luck affording lawyers fees.

I absolutely agree

People who are already privileged enough to work from home need more incentive to buy into services they used to use. Idk

They still use those services, just not in downtown NYC.

Lets see who profits from this

This might apply to the argument of cursive over print writing style

I cant even access my streaming services without being snooped on per the 'privacy agreement.'

Essentially my tv is bricked outside of traditional cable.

I dont use or set up voice commands but the privacy agreement allows them to store my voice for voice commands without setup.

If I dont agree to the privacy statement I cant use my paid for streaming services.

Life in this century is a total joke.

I will never get another smart tv and I hope the trend dies.

>Let's make it very, very expensive again.

That is a small goal of GDPR.

GDPR has enough holes that governments can continue to expand surveillance as they wish.

Most notably there is a government shaped hole in the GDPR. Governments are largely exemt from it. And companies are allowed to collect data they are legally required to collect, so delegating the work still works if it's done by law.

Still a massive improvement over the previous status quo, data collection is now much more transparent which makes it easier to oppose.

Well it will probably be an arms race between time, money, and efforts to mislead all data aggregation. Dealing with paid ideologues will be more difficult and harmful. With the past years hacks I don't see our databases being free of fouling.