Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Freebytes's comments login

Along with having block lists, perhaps you could add poison to your results that generates random bad code that will not work, and that is only seen by bots (display: none when rendered), and the bots will use it, but a human never would.


This might be because they are referencing single step, and I do not think o1 is single step.


In the past, BASIC was certainly the easiest programming language to use, but ironically, many newer programming languages are now actually easier to learn. Yes, BASIC is easy, but Python, PHP, and C# are actually just as easy as the old syntax when it comes to web based solutions.


> Python, PHP, and C# are actually just as easy as the old syntax

I'd really dispute that.

I've never looked at C# but no member of the C or greater curly-braces family is genuinely easy. It's just familiarity.

Python is a mess in places because the C libraries underneath show through.

This ugly mess:

https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#printf-style...

PHP is an ugly mess from "Hello, world" on up.


I don't think the idea behind PureBasic and SpiderBasic was simplicity. (One alluring property of PureBasic has been the ability to do inline ASM... But in a speedy production environment.)

It's proably more like "there was a time in which computers were shipped with their own programming language, and it was BASIC (interfaced to ROM and machine code)". So, it's "BASIC as the fundamental coding tool your computer should have been shipped with".


  I'd definitely recommend Python to newbies over any other language.


Something that languages like Visual BASIC or SpiderBasic get right is including an opinionated GUI toolkit which is well integrated with the language and straightforward to use.

Less flexibility than Python or JavaScript, but standardized, relatively easy to use, and always there by default.


The 'people' that undergo this first will experience the most incredible pain imaginable if we do not figure out a way to block such pain first.


I consider that I have likely died more than twice in my lifetime already. And before this body gives up, I will have already died more times. Must simply enjoy the present and give gifts to my future self.


The LLM will apologize for the mistake, tell you it understands now, and then proceed to make the exact same mistake again.


Is the country wide 2FA implemented by the country or a private company? While rare, what if a person does not have access to the 2FA mechanism, and what mechanisms are permitted to confirm an identity?


You cannot copy a nuclear weapon via drag and drop.


I had a hard time getting Doom to run on my 486. I only had something like 4MB of RAM if I recall correctly so I had to restart my computer, edit the AUTOEXEC.BAT to remove options that I would use to load Windows, and then boot back into DOS to launch DOOM each time I wanted to play it to get that last bit of memory I needed. Then, when I wanted to run Windows, I had to edit the HIMEM.SYS stuff to get it running again. (I was a teenager with no Internet access. I have no idea how I figured out this stuff or where I got information from.)


"norton commander" shell had a user defined menu where you could create short scripts, basically just a chain of DOS commands. As a fellow teenager with no Internet access, I've made a "game" submenu which replaced normal autoexec.bat with a slim one curated for a particular game and rebooted computer right into the game. After you exit the game it'll replace autoexec.bat with the backup of normal one and reboot again back into norton commander.

I have no idea why I needed that level of automation, of course.


My friend had a 486 (We only had a 386), but it would play doom really well.

However, the first step of any gaming session was to reboot the machine with the boot floppy in, which had the right boot settings for gaming performance.


Starting with DOS 6.0 (which came out before DOOM), there was an option to create a menu where you could choose different CONFIG.SYS (and AUTOEXEC.BAT via a variable) options. No need to edit it every time or use a floppy just to get different settings![0]

[0] http://smallvoid.com/article/dos-multiple-configurations.htm...


I recently installed DOS 6.22 on an old laptop. By old, I mean a core2duo with 4GB of ram. It was hilarious to me that I needed to google the correct settings to use to get a game that requires 4MB to work on a machine with 4GB.

My actual goal was to setup QBasic for my son, which I did-- but he thought it was stupid and refused to even let me show him how to code a Hello World app on it. :(


I'm sorry this happened to you. If you were my dad, I would have thought you showing me QBASIC would have been the coolest thing ever.

It kind of reminds me of my dad when he built our first whitebox 486 PC in 1992. Getting to sit on his lap while we messed around in DOS and some games from the era really stuck with me forever. He also loved to mess around in a BBS and would show me how cool it was that we could communicate with other systems at a long distance via modem. :)


We need to create something that look better! Let us update a small set of applications one at a time and leave the others that look like they are from Windows 98 still in place.

Years later, that look is old. We should update the look. But what about the other stuff we have not updated yet that is still old looking? We will get to it later.

Meanwhile, you have three or four different layouts and designs and patterns throughout the system. It is crazy. They finally updated "System" to look like the rest of Windows, but if you click "Advanced System Settings", it still brings up the old System Properties. And it is crazy that the old one is still easier to navigate and find what you are trying to find.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: