And now they are superhuman with regards to "Fog of war"!
A truly crushing next step would be to make "World in Flames" into a computer game, and have Alpha-Star-Zero, which is coming, to become the best it can on that.
If they do that, every single military on the planet should crap themselves, including the US, Nato, Russia, China, and EU. It means that 20 years or less to robots able to operate at every level in an army from soldier to general, and able to comprehensively defeat the best humans at it, at every level. The first nation to the battlefield with this wins the world. One ironic part is that an excellent application is non-battlefield warfare. You don't have to drive a tank to conquer the world; perhaps you can buy a factory or make a deal. The corporate interface here should also be compelling.
Perhaps Alphabet will finally be able to use this to make non-advertising profits.
You are comparing formal systems, like Starcraft, where the entire game world is quantized, with the real world where the games are not quantized.
Not only is the game of war not “written down” in digital form, there is far too much data to ever write down. Military strategists have been trying to model war forever. But no one can even agree on what the “game pieces” are, let alone list all of the Deus Ex Machina that might show up. An AI that is better than any human commander at tank warfare would have been just as dead as any human army when the opponent shows up with an H-bomb.
But being good at tank warfare also isn’t anything like being good at a tank game. To be good at tank warfare you need to be good at building factories. Pouring concrete in swamps. Convincing grannies to buy fewer cans of beans, and eat more squash. Figuring out when your workers really need to go home and sleep. Part of the game is just realizing thosethings are even things you might want to think strategize around.
And the nature of competition in real life is that as players gain advantages, opponents copy their skills and those advantages cease to work. Then you have to find new advantages in some aspect of the game that has never been documented before.
In a sense, high level real world competition is more like MAKING games than playing them. It’s about designing a competitive landscape where your opponent won’t be able to design their way out of it. Something AIs haven’t, to my knowledge, even begun to be able to think about.
Duh! It is 1/3 the cost (bullshit aside) for someone from a culture of hunger, hard work, desperation, and oppression. That makes them easy to work very hard, unlikely for them to push back, and so they have superior output for 1/3 the price. There is no book-cooking megacorp in the US that doesn't prefer H1b to citizens with the same qualifications. Not one.
A "competitive" work schedule in China is 9-9-6, or 9am to 9pm for 6 days a week. That means "normal" is a 72 hour work-week plus commute. A 40-hour work week, is comparatively cake. The 72 hour work-week is 80% increase over a 40 hour work-week. The HR ghouls say imagine salaried employees being glad to work 80% more hours, including nights or weekend hours, for the same pay: amazing; sold!
The book-cooking for h1b is intense, but after talking personally with a dozen or so folks, they really do only take home about 1/3 to 1/2 what their peers do. There is bs about job duties, titles, responsibilities, but that is just folks trying to pay the lowest price for a commodity worker. I've seen several fortune 100 companies say they prefer "low cost geo's" as much as h1b so that gives a second population with similar pricing. It is open knowledge that engineers in Malaysia, India, or Costa Rica are paid 1/3 of US wages for what is, as far as HR can tell, the same job. They do the same job, and get a lot lower wages for it.
When someone was bullied as a child, they are easier to bully as an adult. Stupid/evil/inept bosses love employees who they can abuse without pushback. Folks from cultures of oppression aren't going to report safety issues to safety folks. They aren't going to report managerial violations to those who police managers. They are non-reporting victims. The HR ghouls see them as "don't make waves" or "get along" and the hiring managers see them as "easy prey". In grad school there were prof's who wouldn't let overseas grad students get even a short break to attend their own mothers funeral, and those guys got away with it. That is "liberal academia" and not the underbelly of corporate/industrial America. Think about what that means for bully-bosses in the workplace.
It isn't going to change unless the value of the commodity can be forced into a competitive market, where the price will go toward actual parity, and the rate of preference will go to parity with citizens. Until that, h1b is the lottery where the only way to lose is not to play.
There is one and only one solution, and it is a lottery. If it becomes an auction, then the h1b prices will double or triple - that is to day they will go up to parity for US wages for the same job.
Why hell do we need something that is 10x stronger than fentanyl or 1000x stronger than herion???
Is there nothing in the world that will make the FDA stop killing people? Opoids kill more than all auto accidents combined including drunk drivers. (36k auto deaths in 2016 vs. 70k opioid deaths in 2017) If Ford made a car that doubled death rates from accidents, it would be burned to the ground in lawsuits.
The FDA is doing that, and all they get are illicit payoffs from drug companies and a body count that they ignore.
I think that leadership should be much more assertive in communicating to the FDA that what they are doing was not in the interests of the American people. I think that people at the FDA should lose their careers over the hundreds of thousands of dead bodies they are creating.
I feel that they steal the universe from me by making new prescriptions that presume normal distribution in use-case, and because the new prescription mandates new glasses.
I have heard that recycling of glasses is illegal. Isn't that like right-to-repair broken for 18th century technology? It is because someone in politics makes a lot of money from it. If someone were to dig out decent documentation there, and make it public, then the problem could be and not just patched with a band-aid.
This sounds like an amazing thing!
Anyone serious does their work reproducibly. This shouldn't add more than a little bit about storage on devices and paper, in terms of costs.
The only winning strategy is if the FBI does investigate, and if there is an actual penalty. Nothing less will impact the long term behavior of AT&T or any other cell company.
Seriously, it is game theory. They are saying "we will stop" because of the presence of the threat. If the threat goes away, then they are going to keep making money/selling you until the threat comes back. Like the boy crying wolf, the villagers (fbi) takes longer to build momentum for the second event than for the first.
The organization is the least common denominator, so its moral capacity is the worst of a 5 year old child. Like raising/disciplining a child, the only way to change their negative behavior is to add an expected penalty to the behavior that is larger than the expected gain, so the risk-reward evaluation they make says "don't do it".
My hope would be that even if the slap is laughably small for the current offense, the thread of larger fines for continued action would be a deterrent to keep going.
My limited experience with legal issues at large companies is that once a precedent has been set for legally risky behavior, the organization becomes extremely averse to approaching that behavior again (due to optics, legal complications, etc.). AT&T doesn't strike me as a company that cares all that much about the optics from citizen customers (as opposed to business customers), but being found to be a serial violator, i would hope, would have larger consequence.
It's easy to find out if they keep doing it, so at least having the FBI force them to sign a statement that they stopped or XYZ happens (with the word prison on it), would be the minimum muster.
No it's not exactly new, but this study used a widely available strain of bacteria. Additionally, this study seems to dig deeper into the physiology of how the introduced bacteria ameliorates the symtopms of autism (improved ion flow causing social interactions to be more rewarding).
A truly crushing next step would be to make "World in Flames" into a computer game, and have Alpha-Star-Zero, which is coming, to become the best it can on that.
http://www.matrixgames.com/products/296/details/World.In.Fla...
If they do that, every single military on the planet should crap themselves, including the US, Nato, Russia, China, and EU. It means that 20 years or less to robots able to operate at every level in an army from soldier to general, and able to comprehensively defeat the best humans at it, at every level. The first nation to the battlefield with this wins the world. One ironic part is that an excellent application is non-battlefield warfare. You don't have to drive a tank to conquer the world; perhaps you can buy a factory or make a deal. The corporate interface here should also be compelling.
Perhaps Alphabet will finally be able to use this to make non-advertising profits.