Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more CryoLogic's commentslogin

https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/ is much more comprehensive, and sadly very few ever read it.

Lots of functionality in the spec that isn't even possible to find on MDN or W3 Schools.


Not sure whether it's fair to compare them. Specifications are usually written using a format language for the ones who implement them and not designed to be a learning material, so many things which are not necessary for this goal are omitted. On the other hand references like MDN are dedicated to the end user, written with a regular language and unnecessary details removed but also with additional explanations and usage examples which are really helpful. So one usually doesn't need to refer to the specification unless there are reasons to do it(e.g. need to understand all the aspects of a feature). It's pretty hard to understand what's written there for a beginner without some context which provided by manuals like MDN.


Be sure to read https://tc39.es/ecma262/ instead of the one hosted on ecma-international.org that has up to a year's worth of unfixed bugs.


Most of the publishing industry still uses .docx, some of the more advanced publishers have moved over to ASCIIDoc - personally I think Markdown is the easiest to use for a big project (having written and published a technical book prior).


Except for scientific publishing, where LaTeX is king.


Most people I know use org mode with inline latex for stuff that needs to be latex.


Ruffle works great in modern browsers and is open source: https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle


If you are interested in learning animation as a hobby, and would like a community to contribute to and learn from - consider joining Anim8 (https://anim8.io).

We are the largest group of hobby animators on the web, and host collaborations, competitions, etc. on an ongoing basis.

We use some of our funding to build free educational content as well which can be found at (https://blog.anim8.io).

We also have a great Discord full of beginner animators as well as pros


There is very little functionality JQuery offers that the modern browser DOM API doesn't provide with more robust performance.


Yeah, this is what some commenters are missing. The real alternative to jQuery isn't some fancy new framework, it's just... plain JavaScript.

Things have really gotten much better in the vanilla world. Although some things remain more verbose or cumbersome than jQuery alternatives, you really don't need a whole layer of abstraction to handle the simple tasks jQuery was designed for any more.

Unless, of course, you care about IE...


jQuery somehow gets abuse for being more bloated and slower than vanilla js despite the fact that almost nobody is ditching jQuery for vanilla js and instead running to vastly slower and more bloated SPA frameworks.


Did this comment onwards miss

"I did my last small project with vanilla js and the ugliness of the native APIs reminded my how lovely jQuery is" or am I seeing wonky here


Yes, but the native APIs are a PITA.


At they? I don't write much js but always found the native apis to be the quickest way to implement functionality when I need to


Yes, nearly every native API is uglier/longer/more inconsistent than jQuery equivalent.


not like they used to be, youngster*

* veteran of the original browser wars


So is jQuery imo, especially the nonsensical argument order for iteration.


DevFactor (https://youtube.com/devfactor) was shut down several years ago due to a similar issue with automated copyright trolling that took YouTube about 3 months to fix per time it happened.


I bought recently from a dealership that was going out of business right by an upscale university and negotiated about $3500 off of MSRP on a new car.

They told me they had to lay off around half their staff due to Covid.

The deals are out there you just have to look for them.


"MSRP" is a meaningless benchmark that is far in excess of the average retail price, even without any real negotiation.


It constitutes a reasonable number from which to compare prices. For instance, 20% off MSRP, 40% off MSRP.


Not really. Percent off MSRP does not translate across models, across brands, or even across years for the same model and brand. (MSRP-to-real-prices inflates year to year.)

So you can't compare some percentage off other than the exact same vehicle sold in the exact same year. But you could already compare the exact sale price of two identical year/model vehicles.


I don’t see how, since there’s a billion different trim levels and models of the same care with different MSRPs.


Agreed. It's like comparing Hz among dissimilar CPUs.


Without more context that may not be a good price. Ignore MSRP. Never pay over invoice.


MSRP is a reference point. So is invoice. You shouldn't ignore either, but one is not a better reference point than the other. Maybe 20 years ago when you had to pay a publisher to get the invoice price, but now that invoice prices are freely available on the Internet, manufacturers have raised invoice prices faster than MSRP and closed the gap between invoice and MSRP. Dealer margin on new car sales now comes from backend rebates and volume incentives that aren't public. The only way to truly discover the bottom line retail price on a car is to present yourself as a serious buyer and get quotes from multiple dealers.


The good rule to live by is you should always be able to negotiate at least 10% off a new car. If one dealer isn't willing to negotiate, go to a different one. Helped loads of people negotiate prices for their new car and 10% is always achievable. The only brand where you can't is KIA - they just flat out don't negotiate, KIA UK sets prices and that's what you pay. The dealership might throw servicing or some accessories to sweeten the deal but there's nothing they can do about the price.


The only rule I know of is supply and demand. If there’s sufficient demand for a product, the seller has no reason to offer anything off. The proof will be that you won’t be able to find a seller willing to sell it.

Before the corona virus stuff, there were certain car models that you didn’t really negotiate much over, such as TRD 4Runners and Tacomas.

Tesla also doesn’t offer 10% off or haggle if I recall. I’m sure they would if they needed to move product, but I don’t know anyone who got any discounts for a Tesla.


I agree with this.

The only good way to negotiate is to find a similar car at another dealer and work back and forth. Without another dealer willing to sell you a car for a better price, you have no leverage.


Adding to this, expand the search radius for a dealer by a couple hundred miles/kms. Check their online inventory to find the vehicle that you want, ideally by looking at the window sticker to compare inventory (website data is generally not reliable).

Many car dealers have APIs that will show the digital window sticker by passing a VIN number -- these are usually embedded on their websites and can be easily found.

Then, negotiate over the phone, reducing prices by 1-2k across each dealer with similar inventory to get a great price, below invoice.


I bought a 4Runner in 2007 for $22,500. The sticker on it said $32,000. Took 2 weeks of negotiation, and high gas prices at the time really helped ($5/gallon).


I would be surprised if someone was able to find one under $40k nowadays (maybe after COVID). You typically have to order them and wait a couple months to get it if you prefer any certain colors or trims.


Tesla does things like offering inflated values for trade-ins rather than outright discounting the new car.


Yeah, I've seen BMW/Mercedes dealers drop prices for a much as 20% which can easily be 10-20k off the listed price.


Anything over invoice less the invoice cost of options on a new vehicle is straight profit for a dealer almost universally.


Lots of YouTube animators have been moonlightning on Anim8 (https://www.anim8.io) as of recently :)

If you are an animation fan you should give it a shot.


Nice to see there is a site for animators to post videos since youtube shafted them with their ad policies requiring longer videos


If you are interested in learning web app security but can't get into Stanford, consider reading this book: https://www.amazon.com/Web-Application-Security-Exploitation...

Covers just about everything a software engineer (or web developer) needs to learn in order to get into security.


The Web Application Hacker's Handbook is also practically a must-read for those in the field.

https://www.amzn.com/B005LVQA9S/


+1 for WAHH! It is quite good in that it covers everything and is very readable for a book on subject as this.


> If you are interested in learning web app security but can't get into Stanford...

there's slides, video, and linked readings for all the sessions in this class, though.


The gold standard for this stuff is The Web App Hacker's Handbook.


If you are interested in learning web app security and can't get into Stanford, consider checking out this book: https://www.amazon.com/Web-Application-Security-Exploitation...

Covers basically everything a software engineer needs to move into security.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: