Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BaconPackets's commentslogin

This is meaningless without context.

Not attacking you but using your message to say to anyone reading: Is there a lesson here about what our AI future looks like? The OG thread comment is using summarized information to induce anxiety. When everyone has a 'suped-up AI bot running around the net for them, how much more noise like this is there going to be? How many people will have armies?

This is such a weird redirect. Biden seems to have pardoned a large amount of low level marijuana offenders.

So yes, there is a difference between what Trump is doing and what Biden is doing.


You missed what I stated, pardoning someone for a specific crime vs what biden(if he was actually doing it) pardoned his son for all crimes he may have done over a 10 year span. Oh wait, that was actually one of the only pardons he actually signed.

edit:

He actually pardoned 5 family members for all non-violent offenses from jan 2014 to jan 2025, does 1 billionaire = 5 biden family members?


Biden pardoned those family members because he knew Trump would personally go after them and make an example of them regardless of what they actually did. It shouldn't have happened, but it's pretty clear why it did.

Also, how on Earth are their "crimes" as egregious as those that Trump has pardoned in his recent term? Seriously, what did they do? How many people did they hurt? You can't just say "corruption" in an ambiguous sense, because then millions of other people would also apply. Also, "I don't know but it's fishy!" doesn't work when we know literally everything in Hunter Biden's life. That was the whole controversy.

The Binance founder directly impacted people in a significant way. The rioters were violent protesters that resulted in loss of life and others fearing for their life. It isn't the pardon itself that is bad, or the number, but the message it sends as to why they would do it. Biden was "if you're in the family of the president, you'll get forgiveness for your poor life decisions". Duh, like it or not, that's always been true, and Biden got roasted for it anyway. He's done, his family is out.

Trump is "if you're rich or you worship me, literal crime is legal".


Earlier you said hundreds. I call bullshit. Including the January 6 select committee members, staff, and police witnesses, the total appears closer to 50.

There is already a couple of options

https://github.com/multycloud/multy

But a multicloud wrapper creates a lot of abstractions.


It’s a strange article. Really focused around gas prices and little about food/home prices.

People can’t eat gas. The impact of a 5% to 10% increase in basic food prices is extreme on most income levels. Especially when you consider families with children.


Gas is underneath the price of everything. And anecdotally, it seems to me like grocery prices have dropped a lot compared to 8-10 months ago. Back then, I remember over and over seeing the prices in the store and being dumbfounded. But now a lot more stuff seems back to a “normal” range. Seemed like once the supply chain crunch eased[0], prices dropped.

[0] https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/policy/gscpi#/interactiv...


It will be interesting to see how policy changes when oil prices do not drive so much of the economy


Well IIRC, the inflation Numbers exclude Gas Prices because if included, the rate would be much higher.

But the world runs on fuel, so if fuel prices rise, prices rise in all other items. Food has to get to the cities from the farm somehow.


They do not exclude gas prices. The Consumer Price Index, which is what most people pay attention to and to which this article refers, currently weights gasoline at 3.7% of the basket of goods it tracks.

https://www.bls.gov/cpi/tables/relative-importance/2021.htm


Core CPI, which is what the Fed typically uses, excludes food and energy.


You don't recall correctly. All the standard inflation numbers in the newspapers, economics papers, COL adjustments etc. include gas prices (as well as food prices). You're probably confused with "core inflation", which excludes food and energy prices, or some other special purpose measure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics which computes the official US inflation numbers publishes several of those. Core inflation in the US is pretty much only used by the Federal Reserve, as a crude form of smoothing rapid fluctuations (alternatives could be using trimmed means, or rolling averages).

Krugman explains it all fairly accessibly: https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0...


> the inflation Numbers exclude Gas Prices

Technically the inflation numbers are posted both ways, including with and without “core energy” so everyone can see the effects either way.


Inflation numbers tend to exclude gas because unlike most other things which tend to slowly rise in price, fuel costs are highly erratic. They are excluded because they add more noise than data.

From 2009 to 2010, the price of gas went up by 25%. From 2014 to 2015 it went down by 25%. Do you think the true rate of inflation is measured by either of those numbers.


That's why we need electric trucks/trains to break the dependence on fuel.


Isn’t rising gas prices always given as an excuse for increases in almost everything else (food included) because things must be transported yadda yadda?


Food prices tend to correlate with gas, because of the high fossil fuel costs of production. This is, of course, a delayed reaction.


>The impact of a 5% to 10% increase in basic food prices

Is it that little? The stuff I buy seems to have gone up 20%+

I suspect my local supermarkets are raising prices partly because of inflation and partly to get fatter margins. Shopping for food on Amazon is sometimes cheaper!


I paid 7.20usd for a dozen eggs this morning. Massachusetts has a law regarding cage raised chickens but this was way far beyond what I was paying six months ago. 2 years ago it was 3-4 dollars a dozen. I remember being surprised when the local chicken growers started charging 5 dollars a dozen.


Gas has been the biggest inflation talking point this year


I would be really curious to drill down into one of these problems. Is super precise really the solution?


That is my feeling as well. I am not sure how this is more than someone rambling and yelling at the cloud.


So....your feeling negates his feeling?


This is a very competitive space. You don't hear about a specific leader because there are so many pretty good options.

They mostly do everything you describe and more.

Cloudability is one.


Cloudability is not an option for small companies.

Can you please mention a few of them that are good options in your view?


Are you looking for GCP/AWS? Check out Economize - https://www.economize.cloud/


I'm really curious at how everyone is approaching scalability/reliability/redundancy at scale.

We are in the midst of a 10k VM migration to AWS and GCP and it's definitely challenging.

Balancing the speed of the migration itself VS not ending up lift and shiftong workloads is difficult.


Ah yes, I knew his name sounded familiar. He's the one proposing that weird mix of NFT and cryptocurrency stuff with Tea.


We recently did a quick POC with py-cui for a TUI app. It worked pretty well but you quickly see the limits.

This looks really interesting and could be a fun way to get into the Go landscape!


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: