I don't think this matter has been settled enough to call it "debunked." From Wired: "Whether Judge Forrest, who’s presiding over Ulbricht’s case, takes a similar view will only become clear in the coming weeks."
> Or maybe the decision by a US Magistrate Court which said private information is fair game, even if its located on servers in other countries, given a valid search warrant.
Sounds irrelevant to me -- isn't it part of the argument here, that the agents did not have a warrant to search the Icelandic server?
> Or maybe the decision by a US Magistrate Court which said private information is fair game, even if its located on servers in other countries, given a valid search warrant.
Sounds irrelevant to me -- isn't it part of the argument here, that the agents did not have a warrant to search the Icelandic server?