Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I did, it's just that they didn't make it clear who the "community" was and how they had gotten wind of the problem, and what exactly they were demanding and how they were demanding it. In any case, I still think she should have gone through a different route. Why should masses of strangers dictate whether or not you have reveal personal information?

I really wish I could help this person (assuming the story is accurate, since some HN posters have pointed out that there are conflicting versions) but the only thing I can think of saying to her is to keep it within the circle of persons who are actually concerned by the whole incident, and seek reparations through legal channels. Nothing good comes out of involving a bunch of internet followers. I'd rather a formal investigation was made instead of witnessing a bunch of armchair detectives harass O'Brien without knowing all of the facts. One of my friends has had to deal with false accusations of a similar nature coming from his deranged ex, so I'd like to know beyond reasonable doubt what happened before thirsting for vengeance.



There are not conflicting versions.

You had to read Twitter to see the deluge of requests from Rubyists wanting gory details.

Making it public helps keep others safe by allowing them to know to be very careful around someone while he is drinking.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: