Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I appreciate your perspective (:

> By analogy I would not ask the school athletes to gain extra weight just because I was forced to jog a mile.

This is why I don't like your analogy (no offense meant); it approximately correlates extrovert=healthy=strong and introvert=unhealthy=weak. While I don't think athletes should be forced to gain weight, I do imagine it's good for extroverts to have to sit with themselves in quietude a little more than they might otherwise, just like I imagine it's good for introverts to do the opposite. Not in every case of course, but speaking broadly.

So I guess I see it as two equally-valid approaches trying to understand each other better, more than anything.

Maybe what I'm saying is: I agree with you — it's a good idea. But it's opposite is also a good idea, and I wouldn't want it to be one-sided.

Maybe another point of fuzziness is whether "introverted" means "bad at social interactions" or "prefers to avoid social interactions" (and/or "finds social interactions draining"). I tend to see it as the latter, but maybe you mean it as the former?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: