Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's true to some extent, but I think the real reason for the coupling is because that's just IBM's use-case and worldview. Cockpit is essentialy a wrapper over systemd commands, and one commentor has demonstrated how it could have been envisioned as a modular platform allowing end-users to wrap anything from direct kernel interfaces to entirely custom commands. They've made something useful and beautiful, but I wish it had been designed to make less assumption about it's runtime environment and expose it's toolkit to end-users so that we could all enjoy it for our own needs.



Any predecessor to cockpit like webmin or cpanel have always been a huge mess, because there is no uniformity in Linux.

Dbus is a message bus for all of Linux, this is a requirement if you want to develop stable tools. A uniform message bus so you don't have to keep changing your code for every single distro and release.


Has it become some weird kind of virtue signaling to replace Red Hat with IBM?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: