Yes but I'm not sure that's the point. I see that point being, "a subtraction between hashes was used instead of a comparison". "Hash of value "a lot" minus minus-a-lot" overflows.
And a nonsensical behaviour of the other product created a large number of those hashes... Which represent PhoneAccounts objects. The software that triggered the bug created a new PhoneAccounts at every onResume (or similar)...
Yes but I'm not sure that's the point. I see that point being, "a subtraction between hashes was used instead of a comparison". "Hash of value "a lot" minus minus-a-lot" overflows.
And a nonsensical behaviour of the other product created a large number of those hashes... Which represent PhoneAccounts objects. The software that triggered the bug created a new PhoneAccounts at every onResume (or similar)...