I suppose. The decision was unwise given his family situation at the time, but it’s hard to put the blame on the loser here and let Amazon get away scot free while treating people infamously bad. The blame is on both parties here, but you seem to only blame the individual rather than the company.

Edit: On a completely unrelated note, does anyone know why Amazon compensates so highly but all of their consumer-facing software is, in my opinion, pretty lacking or dated compared to some of its FAANG peers? Is it just that B2B > B2C?