To be fair to the person above, the article is really confusing by always referring to the product as a "Sony A1" as if it was completely obvious to everyone what it is.
I thought it's a weird super expensive smartphone until I read the author's bio.
Count me too, I've thought it to be a TV for a minute if I didn't know the sites and their citation (PetaPixels) are for photo(video)graphy. But then item weighs just 1.4kg is no way a TV.
The thing that confirmed for me that this was a camera was the domain of the article, which relates to photography. As others have noted, Sony’s naming scheme is confusing.
I thought it's a weird super expensive smartphone until I read the author's bio.