please read the document before dismissing it as a consiparcy theory. It clearly mentions to people in other countries to protest in front of Indian embassies.
What does someone from UK understand about Indian farmers?
By all means protest in India - without resorting to violence.
No point in protesting in other country unless you think that will create external pressure on the Indian government.
Here the government is willing to talk further, even put a stay on the laws for 18 months , but the protestors just do not want to collaborate.
I agree that the government should have been transparent from the beginning. The stubbornness of ruling government escalated situation. But atleast now they are ready to talk.
Why do the protesters still want to keep escalating by resorting to violence?
What does someone from UK understand about Indian farmers? By all means protest in India - without resorting to violence. No point in protesting in other country unless you think that will create external pressure on the Indian government. Here the government is willing to talk further, even put a stay on the laws for 18 months , but the protestors just do not want to collaborate.
I agree that the government should have been transparent from the beginning. The stubbornness of ruling government escalated situation. But atleast now they are ready to talk. Why do the protesters still want to keep escalating by resorting to violence?