In principle this should not be a big problem. See how Red Hat successfully works with GPL code.
I think the big issue is that all Sass Providers considered themselves free from such pesky license details like copyleft, because they don't distribute software.
I think the biggest problem with the SSPL is its vagueness when it comes to liabilities and its broad reach when it comes to contagion. In principle, a copyleft license that covers service providers is long due, but it better be a good and practical one.
I think the big issue is that all Sass Providers considered themselves free from such pesky license details like copyleft, because they don't distribute software.
I think the biggest problem with the SSPL is its vagueness when it comes to liabilities and its broad reach when it comes to contagion. In principle, a copyleft license that covers service providers is long due, but it better be a good and practical one.