Yeah I still don’t understand the need to split servers at 10 users. Even if thi... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		stingraycharles on Feb 5, 2020 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Scaling to 100k Users Yeah I still don’t understand the need to split servers at 10 users. Even if this is in parallel, it must still mean there is a well-beyond-average resource consumption per user.

cwingrav on Feb 5, 2020 [–]

Probably so when your 10 users grow to 1000, your efforts at 10x are good for 1000x, and you’re working on 100000x.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact