Right; quacks were the norm until the medical profession organized.
Its fair to argue that the AMA etc have overstepped, are protectionist etc. But we surely don't want to throw out the baby with the bath water. We want to hold medical practitioners to some standard. Which probably excludes preying on vulnerable people for naieve experimentation?
Its fair to argue that the AMA etc have overstepped, are protectionist etc. But we surely don't want to throw out the baby with the bath water. We want to hold medical practitioners to some standard. Which probably excludes preying on vulnerable people for naieve experimentation?