Is laughter the right response? Perhaps they have several decades of counter-evidence or question the soundness of the research done supporting the lipid hypothesis? I feel like curiosity is always appropriate.
> Perhaps they have several decades of counter-evidence
They don't. At best, they are armed with a few dozen recent, biased, cherry-picked publications with illogical conclusions, which I'm happy to pick apart if anyone can actually cite them.
The downvotes only affirm my point - people would rather be in denial than search, find and read the research for themselves, and admit they had been fooled.
