It's obvious if you ever were anywhere close to a process of hiring a programmer. It's hard to find competent people. There is a lot of competition. A lot of positions companies could profitably hire at decent salaries won't ever be filled because salaries of people qualified to do those jobs start above profitability threshold.
Besides, it's not rocket science that having more talented productive people in your country is a good idea.
> Any information related to a natural person or ‘Data Subject’, that can be used to directly or indirectly identify the person. It can be anything from a name, a photo, ... or a computer IP address.
Emphasis mine.
I said:
> IPs don't count as long as you're collecting them for security purposes and don't have a way to identify a person using the IP.
Glad to hear you are entering your next profession with eyes open.
My first job at 13 was on a farm and I lasted about a week before I realized I wasn't made for that life and I started planning on going to college. There is a long tradition of people claiming that life is for them without having ever actually done it successfully (I'm looking at you Thoreau).
If you think that you'd be happier living that way I don't see much reason not to go do it. But the complaints in your comment don't seem to be addressed by your desire to work as a farmer. Your debt levels, insurance rates and chance for retirement are all likely to be much, much worse as a farmer (subsistence or otherwise) than as a software developer. In fact, right now, you would be hard pressed to find an occupation that optimizes for those 3 things better than working as a software engineer.
But, of course those things don't have to be tied to someones happiness. If they aren't tied to yours, don't conflate them.
Besides, it's not rocket science that having more talented productive people in your country is a good idea.